New Historicism: Text and Context

Violeta M. Vesić

doi:10.21301/EAP.V10.I1.10

Violeta M. Vesić Department of Philology University of Novi Pazar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21301/EAP.V10.I1.10

Keywords:

New Historicism, culture, history, politics, text, context

Abstract

During most of the twentieth century history was seen as a phenomenon outside of literature that guaranteed the veracity of literary interpretation. History was unique and it functioned as a basis for reading literary works. During the seventies of the twentieth century there occurred a change of attitude towards history in American literary theory, and there appeared a new theoretical approach which soon became known as New Historicism. Since its inception, New Historicism has been identified with the study of Renaissance and Romanticism, but nowadays it has been increasingly involved in other literary trends. Although there are great differences in the arguments and practices at various representatives of this school, New Historicism has clearly recognizable features and many new historicists will agree with the statement of Walter Cohen that New Historicism, when it appeared in the eighties, represented something quite new in reference to the studies of theory, criticism and history (Cohen 1987, 33). Theoretical connection with Bakhtin, Foucault and Marx is clear, as well as a kind of uneasy tie with deconstruction and the work of Paul de Man. At the center of this approach is a renewed interest in the study of literary works in the light of historical and political circumstances in which they were created. Foucault encouraged readers to begin to move literary texts and to link them with discourses and representations that are not literary, as well as to examine the sociological aspects of the texts in order to take part in the social struggles of today. The study of literary works using New Historicism is the study of politics, history, culture and circumstances in which these works were created. With regard to one of the main fact which is located in the center of the criticism, that history cannot be viewed objectively and that reality can only be understood through a cultural context that reveals the work, re-reading and interpretation of literature is not just re-reading of texts that are already well known, but reading in a completely new way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bannet, Eve Tavor. 1989. Structuralism and the Logic of Dissent: Barthes, Derrida, Foucault, Lacan. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Bercovitch, Sacvan. 1994. The Cambridge History of American Literature, Vol. I, 1590-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brannigan, John. 1998. New Historicism and Cultural Materialism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bužinjska, Ana i Mihal Pavel Markovski. 2009. Književne teorije XX veka. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Colebrook, Claire. 1997. New Literary Histories: New Historicism and Contemporary Criticism. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
Cohen, Walter. 1987. "Political Criticism of Shakespeare". In Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in Ideology and History, ed. J. Howard, M. O’Connor, 18-46. London: Methuen.
Cox, Jeffry and Larry J. Reynolds. 1993. New Historical Literary Study: Essays on Reproducing Texts, Representing History. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Felbabov, Vladislava 2002. Novi istorizam. Dometi 29:7-42.
Foucault, Michael. 1972. The Archeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Gallagher, Catherine and Stephen Greenblat. 2000. Practicing New Historicism. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Geertz, Cliford. 1993. "Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture". In The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, 3-30. London: Fontana.
Geertz, Cliford. 1993. "The Impact of the Concept of culture on the Concept of Man". In The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, 33-54. London: Fontana.
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1980. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Hamilton, Paul. 1996. Historicism. London: Routledge.
Hawthorn, Jeremy. 1996. Cunning Passages: New Historicism, Cultural Materialism and Marxism in the Contemporary Literary Debate. London: Arnold.
Hoare, Quintin and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. (ed.) 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.
Howard Jean. 1986. The New Historicism in Renaissance Studies. English Literary Renaissance 16:13-43.
Jay, Gregory. S. 1990. America the Scrivener: Deconstruction and the Subject of Literary History. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, 1990.
Krieger, Murray.1987. The Aims of Representation: Subject/Text/History. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lynn, Steven. 2001. Texts and Contexts: Writing about Literature with Critical Theory. New York: University of South Carolina.
Marx, Karl and Fridrich Engels. 1991. Selected Works. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Marx, Karl. 2008. The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: Wildside Press.
Miller, Hillis J. 1987. Presidential Address, 1986. The Triumph of Theory, the Resistance to Reading and the Question of the Material Base. PMLA 102: 281-291.
Montrose, Louis. 1989. "Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture". In The New Historicism, ed. H. A. Veeser, 15-36. London: Routledge.
Morris, Wesley. 1972. Toward a New Historicism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Plato. 1987. The Republic. London: Penguin.
Rigney, Ann. 1999. "Literature and the Longing for History". In Critical Self-Fashioning. Stephen Greenblat and the New Historicism , ed. J. Pieters, 21-43. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Said, Edward. 1979. Orientalism, New York: Vintage.
Tillyard, Eustace Mandeville Wetenhall . 1944. The Elizabethan World Picture. New York: Macmillan.
Veeser, Aram H. (ed.) 1994. New Historicism: Reader. New York and London: Routledge.
Wilson, Richard and Richard Dutton. 1992. New Historicism and Renaissance Drama. London: Longman.