The Influence of Johannes Fabian on Claude Lévi -Strauss
Abstract
Downloads
References
Marcus, George, E. and Michael Fischer. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
D’Andrade, Roy. 2006. ed. “Searle on Institutionsâ€. Tematski broj. Anthropological Theory 6, 1: 5-125.
Carrithers, Michael 1990. Is Anthropology Art or Science? Current Anthropology 31 (3): 263-282.
Denzin, Norman and Ivonna Lincoln. eds. 2000. Handbook od Qualitative Research (drugo izdanje). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Di Leonardo, Micaela. 1993. What a Difference Political Economy Makes: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era. Anthropological Quarterly 66 (2): 76-80.
Diamond, Stanley, Bob Scholte and Eric Wolf. 1975. Anti-Kaplan: Defining the Marxist Tradition. American Anthropologist 77 (4): 870-876.
Dirkem, Emil i Marsel Mos. 2005 (1903). O nekim primitivnim oblicima klasifikacije. Žurnal za sociologiju 3: 78-128.
Duranti, A., Goodwin, C. (Eds.), 1992. Rethinking Context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Fabian, Johanes. 1976, Letter to Jarvie (komentar teksta 'Epistle to the anthropologists' I.C. Jarvie-a, sa odgovorom samog autora). American anthropologist 78 (2): 344-5.
Fabian, Johannes. 1971. On professional ethics and epistemological foundations [komentar teksta 'The problem of ethical integrity in participant observation' I.C. Jarvie-a, sa odgovorom samog autora i P. Kloos-a). Current anthropology 12 (2): 230-2.
Fabian, Johannes. 1990. Presence and Representation: The Other and Anthropological Writing. Critical Inquiry 16 (4): 753-772.
Fabijan, Johanes 2001/1983 Vrijeme i drugo: Kako antropologija pravi svoj predmet. Nikšić: Jasen.
Feleppa, Robert. 1986. Emics, etics and social objectivity. Current Anthropology 27 (3): 243-255.
Fisher, Lawrence E., and Oswald O. Werner. 1978. Explaining Explanation: Tension in American Anthropology. Journal of Anthropological Research 34 (2): 194-218.
GaÄanović Ivana. 2009. AntropoloÅ¡ke perspektive o/u kulturi revizije. Antropologija 8: 81-97.
Gavrilović, Ljiljana. 2009. Domaća antropologija na stranim jezicima, ili dobrovoljna auto-kolonijalizacija. Antropologija 8: 53-68.
Gordon, Deborah A. 1993. “The unhappy relationship of feminism and postmodernism in anthropologyâ€. Anthropology Quaterly 66 (3): 109-117.
Jarvie, Ian C. 1969 The problem of ethical integrity in participant observation. Current Anthropology 10 (5): 505-8, 512-23.
Jarvie, Ian C. 1975 Epistle to the Anthropologists. American Anthropologist 77 (2): 253-266
Jarvie, Ian C. 1983 The problem of the ethnographic real. Current Anthropology 24 (3): 313-25.
Jarvie, Ian C. 1984 Anthropology as Science and the Anthropology of Science and of Anthropology or Understanding and Explanation in the Social Sciences, Part II. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philoosphy of Science Association 2: 745-763.
Kaplan, David 1975 The Idea of Social Science and Its Enemies: A Rejoinder. American Anthropologist 77 (4): 876-881.
Kaplan, David. 1974. The Anthropology of Authenticity: Everyone his own Anthropologist. American Anthropologist 76 (4): 824-839.
KovaÄ S., i M. Milenković. 2006. Ponovljene studije u antropologiji: Van Bek vs. Griol. Antropologija 2: 89-109.
KovaÄević, Ivan. 2008. O pisanju istorije antropologije kraja dvadesetog i poÄetka dvadeset prvog veka. Antropologija 6: 9-18.
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lewis, Herbert. 2009. The Radical Transformation of Anthropology: History Seen through the Annual Meetings of the American Anthropological Association, 1955–2005. Histories of Anthropology Annual 5: 200-228.
Malinowski, Bronisław. 1966. “The Method of Fieldwork and the Invisible Facts of Native Law and Economics†u: Coral gardens and their magic, Vol. 2, 317-340. London: Allen and Unwin.
Mascia-Lees, Frances, Patricia Sharpe, and Colleen Ballerina Cohen. 1989. The postmodernist turn in anthropology: Cautions from a feminist perspective. Signs 15 (1): 7-33.
Milenković, Miloš. 2003. Problem etnografski stvarnog : Polemika o Samoi u krizi etnografskog realizma. Beograd : Srpski genealoški centar.
Milenković, Miloš. 2006. Šta je (bila) antropološka 'refleksivnost': Metodološka formalizacija. Etnoantropološki problemi 1 (2): 157-184.
Milenković, Miloš. 2007b. Istorija postmoderne antropologije: Posle postmodernizma. Beograd : Filozofski fakultet i Srpski genealoški centar.
Milenković, Miloš. 2007c. Paradoks postkulturne antropologije - postmoderna teorija etnografije kao teorija kulture. Antropologija 3: 121-143.
Milenković, MiloÅ¡. 2007d. Istraživanje, terensko. U: Mimica, AljoÅ¡a i Marija BogdanoviÄ ur. SocioloÅ¡ki reÄnik, 209-210. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike.
Milenković, Miloš. 2009a. Interdisciplinarni afiniteti postmoderne antropologije. Deo 1: Paradigmatski zastoji i opšta mesta interdisciplinarne redukcije. Antropologija 7: 31-52.
Milenković, MiloÅ¡. 2009b. Unutar-disciplinarni afiniteti postmoderne antropologije, deo I - posledice objedinjavanja etike, politike i metodologije u kritiÄkoj antropologiji 1960-ih. EtnoantropoloÅ¡ki problemi 4 (3): 103-116.
Milenković, MiloÅ¡. 2009c. O brojanju i merenju (drugih) ljudi (za novac): Moralne/civilizacijske implikacije ukidanja druÅ¡tveno-humanistiÄkih nauka u Srbiji putem scijentometrijske pseudonauke. Antropologija 8: 33-52.
Milenković, Miloš. 2010. Istorija postmoderne antropologije: Intertemporalna heterarhija. Beograd: Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu i Srpski genealoški cenatr (u štampi).
Polier, Nicole, and William Roseberry. 1989. Tristes tropes: Postmodernist anthropologists encounter the other and discover themselves. Economy and Society 18 (2): 245-264.
Scholte, Bob. 1971. Discontents in Anthropology. Social Research 38 (4): 777-807.
Scholte, Bob. 1974. Toward a Reflexive and Critical Anthropology. U: Hymes, Dell (ed) Reinventing Anthropology, 430-457. New York: Vintage Books.
Scholte, Bob. 1976. Dwelling on the Everyday World: Phenomenological Analysis and Social Reality. American Anthropologist 78 (2): 585-589.
Scholte, Bob. 1978. On the Ethnocentricity of Scientistic Logic. Dialectical Anthropology 3, 2: 177 – 189.
Scholte, Bob. 1986. The charmed circle of Geertz’s hermeneutics: A Neo-Marxist critique. Critique of Anthropology 6 (1): 5-15.
Shankman, Paul. 1984a. The Thick and the Thin: On the Interpretive Theoretical Program of Clifford Geertz. Current Anthropology 25 (3): 261-80.
Šipka, Pero. 2001. Nauka u Srbiji: U susret evaluativnoj državi. Centar za evaluaciju u obrazovanju i nauci. Internet dokument : http://ceon.rs/pdf/eRD1.pdf
Vuković, Ivan. 2009. Idealisme transcendental et structuralisme. Etnoantropološki problemi 4 (2): 75-82.
Žikić Bojan. 2007. Qualitative Field Research in Anthropology. An Overview of Basic Research Methodology. Etnoantropološki problemi 2 (2): 123-135.
All articles in Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which allows authors and users to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the article under the same conditions as in the licence.
The CC BY SA license permits non-commercial and commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
Copyright on any research article published by Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology is retained by the author(s).
Authors grant to the Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology the right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media. Copyright and source must be acknowledged and a link must be made to the article's DOI.