The Question of World University Rankings, Or: On the Challenges Facing Contemporary Higher Education Systems
Cooper, Paul. 2007. Knowing your ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty in UK Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education 13(1): 19-29.
Delanty, Gerard. 2003. Ideologies of the Knowledge Society and the Cultural Contradictions of Higher Education. Policy Futures in Education 1(1): 71-82.
Derek, Bok. 2005. Univerziteti na tržištu. Beograd: Clio.
Douglas, Jacqueline and Alex Douglas. 2006. Evaluating teaching quality. Quality in Higher Education 12(1): 3–13.
Evans, Lewis. 1997. The Quest for Quality in Universities. Agenda 4(4): 399-406.
Florian, Răzvan V. 2007. Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics 72(1): 25-32.
Gačanović, Ivana. 2009. Antropološke perspektive o/u kulturi revizije. Antropologija 8: 82-97.
Griffith, A. and K. Rask. 2007. The Influence of the US News and World Report Collegiate Rankings on the Matriculation Decision of High-Ability Students: 1995-2004. Economics of Education Review 26(2): 244-55.
Hazelkorn, Ellena. 2009a. Impact of Global Rankings on Higher Education Research and the Production of Knowledge. UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge, Occasional Paper No. 15: 1-14. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Dostupno na: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/ 0018/001816/181653e.pdf
Hazelkorn, Ellena. 2009b. Rankings and the (re)Construction of Knowledge. Centre for Social and Educational Research. Dostupno na: http://arrow.dit.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article =1005&context=cseroth
Holmes, Richard. 2006. The THES University Rankings: Are They Really World Class?. Asian Journal of University Education 2(1): 1-14. Dostupno na: http://www.oocities.com/universities06/ajueart.pdf
Kornbrot, Diana Eugenie. 2007. Misleading ‘quality’ measures in Higher Education: problems from combining diverse indicators that include subjective ratings and academic performance and costs. Radical Statstics 94: 48-63.
Kovačević, Ivan. 2008. Odnos države prema humanističkim naukama u Srbiji početkom XX veka: Citatometrija kao pokušaj ubistva srpske antropologije. Etnoantropološki problemi 3(2): 27-43.
Kovačević, Ivan. 2009. O ćurkama, pilićima i citatnim indeksima. Antropologija 8: 9-31.
Liessmann, Konrad Paul. 2008. Teorija neobrazovanosti: Zablude društva znanja. Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk.
Milenković, Miloš. 2009. O brojanju i merenju (drugih) ljudi (za novac). Antropologija 8: 33-52.
Myers, Luke and Jonathan Robe. 2009. College rankings: History, Criticism and Reform. A Report from the Center for College Affordability and Productivity, Washington, DC. Dostupno na: http://www.centerforcollegeaffordability.org/uploads/College _Rankings _History.pdf
Roberts, Andy. 2002. A Principled Complementarity of Method: In Defence of Methodological Eclecticism and the Qualitative-Quantitative Debate. The Qualitative Report 7(3). Dostupno na: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR7-3/roberts.html
Shore, Cris and Susan Wright. 1999. Audit Culture and Anthropology: Neo-Liberalism in British Higher Education. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5 (4): 557-75.
Shore, Cris and Susan Wright. 2000. “Coercive accountability: the rise of audit culture and higher education”. In M. Strathern (ed.) Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy, 57– 89. London: Routledge.
Stella, Antony and David Woodhouse. 2006. Ranking of Higher Education Institutions. AUQA Occasional Publication: 1-26. Dostupno na: http://www.auqa.edu.au/files/publications/ranking_of_higher_education_institutions_final.pdf
Strathern, Marylin. 2000. The Tyranny of Transparency. British Educational Research Journal 26(3): 309-321.
Webster, David S. 1992. „Reputational Rankings of Colleges, Universities and Individual Disciplines and Fields of Stduy, From Their Beginnings to the Present”. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research Vol. 8, ed. J. C. Smart, 234-304. New York: Agathon Press.
All articles in Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which allows authors and users to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the article under the same conditions as in the licence.
The CC BY SA license permits non-commercial and commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
Copyright on any research article published by Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology is retained by the author(s).
Authors grant to the Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology the right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media. Copyright and source must be acknowledged and a link must be made to the article's DOI.