In regard to Levi-Strauss’s "motive of oblivion"

Structure of disturbed communication and styles of thoughts in transitory Serbia

  • Dragana Antonijević Department of Ethnology and Anthropology Faculty of Philosophy University of Belgrade
Keywords:
Levi-Strauss’s motive of oblivion, structure of disturbed communication, styles and communities of thoughts, modes of veridiction, transition, socio-normative function of the semantics of the oblivion

Abstract

This paper starts with Levi-Strauss’s semantic concept that consists of oblivion, misunderstanding, indiscretion and nostalgia. Through his analysis of North American and Greek myths, Levi-Strauss concluded that "semantic filed of oblivion" has an important meaning especially in the construction of particular rules and rituals; or, in other words, it has an important part in the introduction of culture to the nature of cognitive and social processes.   After the introduction of concept Structure of disturbed communication and some corrections to the Levi-Strauss’s concept, I start with the proposition that the period of transition represents unstable and ‘slippery’ time in which society negotiates different meanings. That is the time when different styles of thoughts, represented by different and powerful groups that have an impact on current social, political and ideological processes, compete with each other fighting for supremacy. Their field of communication can be seen as a field of "disturbed communication", which in the final instance has a normative function: to reinforce and regulate certain attitudes, ideas and knowledge. This is achieved through the narratives which symbolise a community of newly established order in the moment of its supposed sociohistorical stabilisation. Finally, combining two different theoretical models – Levi-Strauss’s one described above with Greimas’s ideas about structures of modes of veridiction, this paper predicts chances of particular paradigmatic forms of thought in transitory Serbia to became dominant modes of thought, despite of their current low visibility in the public sphere. In mythical terms, it seems though that their domineering efforts are predetermined to success or fail, since they position themselves according to the laws immanent to these structures themselves, which on their part a priori position these structures as powerful orpowerless, influential or non-influential communities of thought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antonijević, Dragana. 1991. Značenje srpskih bajki. Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU, Posebna izdanja knj. 33.

Antonijević, Dragana. 2007a. Karađorđe i Miloš: Između istorije i predanja. Srpski genealoški centar, Etnološka biblioteka, knj. 32, Beograd.

Antonijević, Dragana. 2007b. Karađorđe i Miloš: Mit i politika. Srpski genealoški centar, Etnološka biblioteka, knj. 33, Beograd.

Antonijević Dragana. 2009. Okviri proučavanja ličnih i porodičnih priča o materijalnom gubitku i porazu. Etnoantropološki problemi, n.s. 4 (1) : 13-35.

de Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. University of California Press.

Courtés, Joseph. 1976. Introduction à la sémiotique narrative et discursive. Paris: Hachette.

Daglas, Meri. 2001. Kako institucije misle. Beograd: Samizdat B92.

Đerić, Gordana. 2009. Društveno pamćenje i primenjena kritika: O pretvaranju poezije u ideološku batinu. Etnoantropološki problemi, n.s. 4 (1) : 17-85.

Ferrara, Fernando. 1974. Theory and Model for the Structural Analysis of Fiction. New Literary History, Changing Views of Character, 5 (2): 245-268.

Greimas, A. J. 1989a. On Meaning. New Literary History, Greimassian Semiotics, 20 (3): 539-550.

Greimas, A.J. 1989b. The Veridiction Contract. New Literary History, Greimassian Semiotics, 20 (3): 651-660.

Greimas. A. J. and J. Courtés. 1976. The Cognitive Dimension of Narrative Discourse. New Literary History, Thinking in the Arts, Sciences, and Literature 7 (3) : 433-447.

Konerton, Pol. 2002. Kako društva pamte. Beograd: Samizdat B 92.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1973. Anthropologie structurale deux. Paris: Plon.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1983. Le regard éloigné. Paris: Plon.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1988. Strukturalna antropologija 2. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

Milošević-Đorđević, Nada. 2000. Od bajke do izreke. Beograd: Društvo za srpski jezik i književnost, biblioteka „Književnost i jezik“ knj. 7.

Rihtman-Auguštin, Dunja. 2000. Ulice moga grada. Beograd: XX vek.

Rot, Klaus. 2000. Slike u glavama. Beograd: XX vek.

Shircliffe, Barbara. 2001. „We Got the best of that World“. A Case for the Study of Nostalgia in the Oral History of School Segregation. Oral History Review 28 (2): 59-84.

Vernant, Jean-Pierre. 1982. Mythe et pensée chez les Grecs, I. Paris: PCM.
Published
2009-10-19
How to Cite
Antonijević, Dragana. 2009. “In Regard to Levi-Strauss’s "Motive of Oblivion"”. Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 4 (2), 167-97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v4i2.10.