On Anthropologists or the Extent to Which Anthropology is a Collection of Intellectual Career

  • Ivan Kovačević Department of Ethnology and Anthropology Faculty of Philosophy University of Belgrade
Keywords:
anthropologists, anthropology, ethnography, reflexivity, autoethnography, anthropological conferences, scientific bureaucracy

Abstract

Anthropologists who can be categorized as "internalists" engage with the self in two completely different ways. Ethnographers with an anthropological diploma arrived at auto-ethnography through reflexivity, while those who deal with the self at the disciplinary level usually write about anthropology or, most often, write histories of anthropology. Anthropologists categorized as "externalist" engage with the world at large. Some of them are classic ethnographers who produce ordinary or "thick" descriptions, some of them try to interpret the world, and the third kind arrive at militant anthropology by way of activist anthropology, and try to change the world in accordance with their political opinion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Eriksen, Thomas Hylland and Finn Sivert Nielsen. 2001. A History of Anthropology. London: Pluto Press.

Geertz, Clifford.1995. Disciplines. Raritan 14 (3): 65-102.

Gorunović, Gordana. 2010 a. Antropologija Kliforda Gerca. Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar i Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakuleteta u Beogradu.

Gorunović, Gordana. 2010 b. Književni zaokret i etnografsko pisanje u američkoj kulturnoj antropolog iji. Antropologija 10 (2): 65-96.

Harris, Marvin. 1972. The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Hemmnig, John. 2003. A Fresh Look at Amazon Indians: Karl von den Steinen and Curt Nimuedaju, Giants of Brazilian Anthropology. Tipity. Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 1 (2):163-178.

Honigmann, John J. 1976. The Development of Anthropological Ideas. Homewood: Dorsey Press.

Ingold, Tim. 2008. Anthropology is Not Etnography. Proceedings of the British Academy 154: 69-92.

Kovačević, Ivan. 2006 a. Individualna antropologija ili antropolog kao lični guslar. Etnoantropološki problemi 1 (1): 17-34.

Kovačević, Ivan. 2006 b. Tradicija modernog. Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar i Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakuleteta u Beogradu.

Kovačević, Ivan. 2010. Antropologija između scijentizma i disolucije. Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar i Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakuleteta u Beogradu.

Liessman, Konrad P. 2008. Teorija neobrazovanosti. Zablude društva znanja. Zagreb: Jasenski i Turk.

Marcus, Georg E. 1997. The Uses of Complicity in the Cnanging Misee-en-Scene of Anthropological Fieldwork. Representations 59 (Special Issue: The Fate of "Culture": Geertz and Beyond): 85-108.

Pandey Trikoli, Nath. 1972. Anthropologists at Zuni. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 116 (4): 331-337.

Risman, Dejvid. 1965. Usamljena gomila. Beograd: Nolit.

Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1995. The Primacy of the Ethical: Proposition for a Militant Anthropology. Current Anthropology 36 (3): 409-420.

Štetić, Snežana. 2007. Posebni oblici turizma. Beograd.

Voget, Fred W.1975. A History of Ethnology. New York: Holt, Runehart and Winston.
Published
2012-02-23
How to Cite
Kovačević, Ivan. 2012. “On Anthropologists or the Extent to Which Anthropology Is a Collection of Intellectual Career”. Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 7 (1), 19-34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v7i1.1.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>