"The Second Sex" in 1950s American Popular Journals

Authors

  • Katarina Lončarević Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Belgrade, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i4.6

Keywords:

The Second Sex, Simone de Beauvoir, translation studies, periodical studies, the United States, women’s question, feminism

Abstract

The Second Sex has been considered one of the most important studies about the women’s question that preceded the so-called second feminist wave in the USA, and the paper deals with the inquiries about the urge to translate The Second Sex into English and for the American audience. Taking into account translation studies, the article approaches the process of translation as not neutral and as one that has far-reaching consequences for the reception of the translated work. In addition, the paper refers to feminist translation studies and the insight that translation invokes questions of power, exclusion, appropriation, and erasure. The rise of periodical studies, on the other hand, gives the opportunity to analyze digitalized journals from the period after the Second World War, and to question on a deeper level the norms and socially accepted ideals of femininity in plural, which, finally, could contribute to a more complex understanding of the position and role of women in postwar America. Having in mind specific the social, political and cultural context in which the first English translation of The Second Sex was published, the paper analyzes the reception of the book in popular journals during 1953, which was highly critical but simultaneously more positive than in France, despite all the problems with the translation that deform Beauvoir’s thought and its existentialist philosophy that underpins her deconstruction of various myths about women. The paper offers deep analysis of thirteen articles published  in six American journals with different editorial policies and intended audiences. The analysis of these first published critiques of the book shows that some topics (the structure of the book, Beauvoir as ‘the French’ author, her alleged misunderstanding of the American context and positive stance towards the USSR, feminism, the ‘unscientific’ analysis that the book provides, existentialism, and Beauvoir's critique of the myth of motherhood), gained much more attention than for example the analysis of the quality of the book's translation, which deeply influences all of the above mentioned topics and problems and, in addition, there is no critical stance towards the role and position of women in the United States after the Second World War in any of the published critiques. The article argues that the reception of The Second Sex which was created in part by these critiques influenced both public opinion and feminists, who would quite soon remobilize the massive feminist movement in the 1960s.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altman, Meryl. 2020. Beauvoir in Time. Leiden, Boston: Brill.

Bair, Deidre. 1987. „‘Madly Sensible and Brilliantly Confused’: From Le Deuxième Sexe to The Second Sex.” Dalhousie French Studies 13: 23–35.

Beauvoir, Simone de. 1956[1952/53]. The Second Sex. London: John Cape.

Beauvoir, Simone de. 2008[1975]. „The Second Sex and American Feminism.” Les Tempes Modernes 1 (647-648): 413–420.

Bogic, Anna. 2009-2010. „The Story of the First English Translation of Beauvoir’s Le Deuxième Sexe and Why It Still Matters.” Simone de Beauvoir Studies 26: 81–93. DOI: 10.1163/25897616-02601011

Bogic, Anna. 2011. „Why Philosophy Went Missing: Understanding the English Version of Simone de Beauvoir’s Le Deuxième Sexe.” In Translating Women, edited by Luise von Flotow, 151–166. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

Dietz, Mery. 1992. „Introduction: Debating Simone de Beauvoir.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 18 (1): 74–88. DOI: 10.1086/494779

Eaton, Evelyn. 1953. „The Second Sex by Simone de Beauvoir and H. M. Parshley.” The American Scholar 22 (3): 368, 370, 372, 374.

Englund, Sheryl A. 1994. „A Dignified Success: Knopf’s Translation and Promotion of The Second Sex.” Publishing Research Quarterly 10: 5–18.

Flotow, Luise von. 2011. „Preface.” In Translating Women, edited by Luise von Flotow, 1–10.Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

Friedan, Betty. 1977[1963]. The Feminine Mistique. New York: Dell.

Friedan, Betty. 1998[1976]. „A Dialogue with Simone de Beauvoir.” In‘It Changed My Life’: Writings on the Women’s Movement, 387–403. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Fridan, Beti. 2010. „Problem koji nema ime.” Genero: časopis za feminističku teoriju i studije kulture 14: 215–233. https://generojournal.org/downloads/genero-14-2010-pp-215-233.pdf

Germain, Rosie. 2013. „Reading The Second Sex in 1950s America.” The Historical Journal 56 (4): 1041–1062. DOI: 10.1017/S0018246X1300006X

Goldman, Olive R. 1953. „A SR Takes Aim at The Second Sex: 6. Public Official.” The Saturday Review, February 21, 31, 41.

Hardwick, Elizabeth. 1953. „The Subjection of Women: Review od Simone de Beauvoir's The Sescond Sex.” Partisan Review 20 (3): 321–331. http://www.bu.edu/partisanreview/books/PR1953V20N3/HTML/files/assets/basic-html/index.html#255

huks, bel. 2006. Feministička teorija: od margine ka centru. Beograd: Feministička 94.

Kalb, Bernard. 1953. „A SR Takes Aim at The Second Sex: The Author.” The Saturday Review, February 21, 26

Latham, Sean, and Robert Scholes. 2006. „The Rise of Periodical Studies.” PMLA 121 (2): 517–531. DOI: 10.1632/003081206X129693

MacDonald, Dwight. 1953. „The Lady Doth Protest.” The Reporter April 14, 36–40.

McGinley, Phyllis. 1953. „A SR Takes Aim at The Second Sex: 4. Housewife.” The Saturday Review, February 21, 29–30.

Mead, Margaret. 1953. „A SR Takes Aim at The Second Sex: 5. Anthropologist.” The Saturday Review, February 21, 30–31.

Menninger, Karl. A. 1953. „A SR Takes Aim at The Second Sex: 1. Psychiatrist.” The Saturday Review, February 21, 26–28.

Meyer, Frank. 1953. „Books in Review: Miscellany. The Second Sex, by Simone de Beauvoir.” The American Mercury, March, 125–126.

Meyerowitz, Joanne. 1993. „Beyond the Feminine Mistique: A Reassesment of Postwar Mass Culture.” The Journal of American History 79 (4): 1455–1482. DOI: 10.2307/2080212

Minow, Martha. 1987. „We, the Family: Constitutional Rights and American Families.” The Journal of American History 74 (3): 959–983. DOI: 10.2307/1902161

Moi, Toril. 2002. „While We Wait: The English Translation of The Second Sex.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 27 (4): 1005–1035. DOI: 10.1086/339635

Montagu, Ashley. 1953. „A SR Takes Aim at The Second Sex: 3. Educator.” The Saturday Review, February 21, 28–29

Ostin, Džon. 1994. Kako delovati rečima. Novi Sad: Matica Srpska.

Phillips, William. 1953. „A French Lady on the Dark Continent: Simone de Beauvoir’s Impressions of America.” Commentary, July 1953. https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/william-phillips-3/a-french-lady-on-the-dark-continentsimone-de-beauvoirs-impressions-of-america/

Powell, Manushag N. 2011. „Afterword: We Other Periodicalists, or, Why Periodical Studies?” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature 30 (2): 441–450. DOI: 10.1353/tsw.2011.0063

Simons, Margaret A. 1983. „The Silencing of Simone de Beauvoir: Guess What’s Missing from The Second Sex.” Women’s Studies International Forum 6 (5): 559–564. DOI:10.1016/0277-5395(83)90081-X

Stevens, Laura M. 2011. „On Translation.” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature 30 (1): 7–13.

Stone, Alison. 2017. „Beauvoir and the Ambiguities of Motherhood.” In A Companion to Simone de Beauvoir, edited by Laura Hengehold and Nancy Bauer, 122–133. Oxford: Wiley, Blackwell.

Tidd, Ursula. 2004. Simone de Beauvoir. London and New York: Routledge.

Walters, Raymond Jr. 1953. „On the Horizon.” The Saturday Review February 7, 46.

Weitzman, Leonore J. 1987. The Divorce Revolution. New York: Free Press. ‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

Wylie, Philip. 1953. „A SR Takes Aim at The Second Sex: Writer.” The Saturday Review, February 21, 28.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-14

How to Cite

Lončarević, Katarina. 2021. “‘The Second Sex’ in 1950s American Popular Journals”. Etnoantropološki Problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 16 (4):1123–1147. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i4.6.