Atenica: In search of lost pyre

  • Staša Babić Department of Archaeology Faculty of Philosophy University of Belgrade
  • Zorica Kuzmanović Department of Archaeology Faculty of Philosophy University of Belgrade
Keywords:
Atenica, princely graves, funerary pyre, symbolics of funerary record,, analogic reasoning

Abstract

Symbolic and cult practices of a community undoubtedly play an important role in the formation of funerary contexts. On the other hand, in the absence of written records on these practices, archaeologists are inclined to base their interpretations upon generalized and simplified ideas on “primitive cults”, such as “solar cult”. In this line of inference, technical aspects of the record are neglected in order to obtain the preconceived symbolic “messages”. Among the princely graves of the Central Balkans, the mounds in Atenica near Čačak have long represented the only example of this type of funeral investigated in the course of systematic archaeological excavations; therefore, numerous researchers have devoted special attention to the construction of these tumuli and the possibilities of interpretation of the rites performed there. In this respect, special significance is assigned to the so-called “ritual area” of the mound II – three rectangular areas bordered by rows of pebbles, with conical pits filled by dark earth, fragments of pottery and burnt bones. The interpretations have ranged from the ideas about cremated human sacrifice, over a replica of a sanctuary, to the complex symbolic of solar cult, expressed in numeric regularities. On the other hand, since the buried individuals are cremated, the areas defined as funerary pyres have been identified in both mounds – relatively small crescent-shaped areas of pebbles with traces of burning. Practical incongruence stemming from this interpretation has remained unexplored, in the effort to link the complex ritual of cremation to the symbolic ideas perceived as appropriate for the cultural context of the Atenica burials – human sacrifice, solar cult. In the circular line of argument, more or less implicitly, these ideas have been applied as the starting premises for the wider interpretation of the cult practices of the community whose exceptional members were buried under the mounds near Čačak.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnold, Bettina. & Nancy L. Wicker (eds.) 2001. Gender and the Archaeology of Death. Oxford: Altamira Press.

Babić, Staša. 2002. ‘Princely Graves’ of the Central Balkans – Critical history of research, Journal of European Archaeology V (1): 70–88.

– – –. 2004. Poglavarstvo i polis – Starije gvozdeno doba centralnog Balkana i grčki svet. Beograd: Balkanološki institut Srpske akademije nauka i umetnosti.

– – –. 2005. “Status identity and archaeology”. In The Archaeology of Identity. Approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion, eds. M. Diaz-Andreu, S. Lucy, S. Babić, D. N. Edwards, 67–85. London, New York: Routledge.

– –2015a. “Biography of a Hill: Novi Pazar in South-Western Serbia”. In The Lives of Prehistoric Monument in Iron Age, Roman and Medieval Europe,eds. M. Díaz-Guardamino, L. García Sanjuán, D. Wheatley, 249–264. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

– – –. 2015b. “Theory in Archaeology”. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol 1, ed. James D. Wright, 899–904. Oxford: Elsevier.

Benac, Alojz. 1987. Predgovor za Praistorija jugoslavenskih zemalja V, ur. Alojz Benac, 11–14. Sarajevo: Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine.

– – –. 2012. Religijske predstave prastanovnika južnoslavenskih zemalja. Sarajevo: Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine.

Benac, Alojz i Borivoj Čović. 1957. Glasinac, dio II – Željezno doba. Sarajevo: Zemaljski muzej.

Čače, Slobodan.1986. Obredi uz kneževski grob u Atenici i tragovi arhaičnog kraljevstva u Iliriku. Radovi Filozofskog fakulteta 24: 13–32.

Čović, Borivoj 1979. „Kneževski grobovi glasinačkog područja”. U Sahranjivanje kod Ilira, ur. M. Garašanin, 143–169. Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti.

Džonson, Metju. 2008.Arheološka teorija. Beograd: Klio.

Đuknić, Milena i Borislav Jovanović. 1966. Ilirska kneževska nekropola u Atenici. Čačak: Narodni muzej.

Edwards, N. David. 2005. “The archaeology of religion”. In: The Archaeology of Identity. Approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion, eds. M. Diaz-Andreu, S. Lucy, S. Babić, D. N. Edwards, 110–128. London, New York: Routledge.

Hodder, Ian. 2012. Entangled. An Archaeology of Relationships between Humans and Things. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Jones, Andrew. 2002. Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jovanović, Borislav. 1979. „Atenica i kneževski grobovi na Glasincu”. U Sahranjivanje kod Ilira, ur. Milutin Garašanin, 63–71. Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti.

Kuzmanović Zorica. 2009. Upotreba etnografskih analogija u arheološkom zaključivanju. Etnoantropološki problemi IV/1: 133–148.

– –. 2010. Refleksivno mišljenje – zamena za analogiju? Primer debate o antičkoj ekonomiji. Etnoantropološki problemi IV/1:151–164.

Lucas, Gavin. 2001. Critical Approaches to Fieldwork. Contemporary and historical archaeological practice. London, New York: Routledge.

– – –. 2012. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mihajlović, D. Vladimir. 2015.„Problem kulturnih odnosa lokalnih zajednica i rimske države: studija slučaja na prostoru pripisanom Skordiscima” Doktorska disertacija, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu.

Palavestra, Aleksandar. 1984. Kneževski grobovi starijeg gvozdenog doba na centralnom Balkanu. Beograd: Balkanološki institut.

– – –. 2009 – „Fragmentation of Amber Necklaces in the Central Balkans Iron Age”. In Amber in Archaeology, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Amber in Archaeology, 164–177. Belgrade: National Museum.

Palavestra, Aleksandar i Vera Krstić. 2006. Magija ćilibara. Beograd: Narodni muzej.

Parker Pearson, Mike. 1999. The Archaeology of Death and Burial. Stroud: Sutton.

Pruitt, C. Tera. 2011. “Authority and the production of knowledge in archaeology” Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge.

Thurston, Tina. 2009. Unity and Diversity in the European Iron Age: Out of the Mists, Some Clarity? Journal of Archaeological Research 17 (4): 347–423.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226814008_Unity_and_Diversity_in_the_European_Iron_Age_Out_of_the_Mists_Some_Clarity. Pristupljeno 19. 7. 2016.DOI 10.1007/s10814-009-9032-z

Vasić, Rastko. 1986. Prilozi proučavanju Atenice. Zbornik radova Narodnog muzeja Čačak 16: 5–21.

– – – . 1987. „Kneževski grobovi iz Novog Pazara i Atenice”. U Praistorija jugoslavenskih zemalja V, ur. Alojz Benac, 644–651. Sarajevo: Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine.
Published
2016-11-02
How to Cite
Babić, Staša, and Zorica Kuzmanović. 2016. “Atenica: In Search of Lost Pyre”. Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 11 (3), 645–659. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v11i3.1.