Archaeology on Screen: Representing Archaeology on Film in Serbia

  • Aleksandar Bandović Department of Archaeology Faculty of Philosophy University of Belgrade
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v8i3.11
Keywords:
popular culture, film, archaeology, archaeologists, archaeological ethics

Abstract

Reading the popular culture may contribute to the reflexive view on a discipline such as archaeology. Film, as a part of popular culture, frequently unveils the hidden messages, which may be an echo of a discipline or its distorted image in the mirror. Film and archaeology share not only the common origins in the modernity, but also the imaginary spaces where the past and the present meet and intertwine. The subjects treated in films, the contexts in which archaeology appears, speak of the place the discipline holds in the society, reminding us at the same time of all the elements encompassed by the archaeological discourse. On the other hand, if we compare the portraits of the imaginary archaeologists (such as Professor Mihajlo Pavlović, Vera Zarić), with the witnesses of archaeology in Serbia over the 20th century (Nikola Vulić, Dragoslav Srejović, Milutin Garašanin), we shall approach the meeting point between academic and general public, science and the audience, theory and practice. Extraordinary individuals, unemployed dreamers living at the borders of the worlds, charming connoisseurs of the underworlds – these are but some of the qualities ascribed to the discipline by the films. However, these stereotypes do not generate out of the void, they are the consequence of the self-representation. This mystification of the discipline leads us back to the debate on the responsibility and ethics of the social scientists inside the society they live in. Of course, the suggested reading is one of the many possibilities, one of the archaeological interpretations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adorno, Theodor i Max Horkheimer. 1974. Dijalektika prosvetiteljstva. Sarajevo: Svjetlost.
Arnold, Bettina. 2006. “Pseudoarchaeology and nationalism”. In Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public, ed. Garrett G. Fagan, 154-179. London: Routledge.
Babić, Staša i Miodrag Tomović. 1996. Milutin Garašanin/Razgovori o arheologiji. Beograd: 3T.
Baxter, Jane. 2002. Popular images and popular stereotypes: images of archaeologists in popular and documentary film. The SAA Archaeological Record, Vol. 2(4): 16–17, 40. Dostupno na: http://www.saa.org/Portals/0/SAA/Publications/thesaaarchrec/sep02.pdf
Bintliff, John. 1993. Why Indiana Jones is smarter than the post-processualists. Norwegian archaeological review 26: 91-100.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory, Vol. 7, No. 1: 14-25
Elijade, Mirča. 1990. Šamanizam i arhajske tehnike ekstaze. Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
Fabijeti, Ugo, Roberto Maligeti, Vinčenco Matera. 2002. Uvod u antropologiju. Od lokalnog do globalnog. Beograd: Clio.
Đorđević, Jelena. 2009. Postkultura. Beograd: Clio.
Fuko, Mišel. 2012. Šta je autor? ( u prevodu Eleonore Prohić). Polja. br. 473: 100-112
Gazin-Schwartz, Amy and Cornelius Holtorf. 1999. “'As long as ever I've known it...': on folklore and archaeology”. In Archaeology and Folklore, ed. by Amy Gazin-Schwartz and Cornelius J. Holtorf , 3-20. London: Routledge.
Hall, Mark. 2004. Romancing the stones: archaeology in popular cinema. European Journal of Archaeology, 7(2): 159–76.
Hamilakis, Yannis. 2007. Nation and its Ruins. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Holtorf, Cornelius. 2007. Archaeology is a Brand: The Meaning of Archaeology in Contemporary Popular Culture. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Fiske, John. 2000. Reading the Popular. London: Routledge.
Fiske, John. 2010. Understanding Popular Culture. London: Routledge.
Jovanović, Aleksandar. 2006. Tlo Srbije zavičaj rimskih careva. Beograd: Princip Bonart Pres.
Jovanović, Aleksandar. 2010. Arheološke beleške uz antički lavirint. Zbornik Matice Srpske za klasične studije 12: 7-23.
Kanic, Feliks. 1991. Srbija, zemlјa i stanovništvo. Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga.
Katić, Lovre. 1934. Don Frane Bulić. Obnovljeni život XV. br. 9: 385-397.
Kovačević, Dušan. 1998. Odabrane drame I. Beograd: Stubovi kulture.
Kroeber, Alfred and Kluckhohn, Clyde. 1952. Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Harvard University Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology Papers 47.
Levi, Pavle. 2010. Raspad Jugoslavije na filmu. Beograd: XX vek.
Lowenthal, David. 1985. The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Marwick, Ben. 2010. Self-image, the long view and archaeological engagement with film: an animated case study. World Archaeology Vol. 42(3): 394–404
McGeough, Kevin. 2006. Heroes, Mummies, and Treasure: Near Eastern Archaeology in the Movies. Near Eastern Archaeology, Vol. 69 (3/4): 174-185.
Novak, Viktor. 1958. „Nikola Vulić (Naučnik i čovek)“. U Iz rimske književnosti, Nikola Vulić, I-LXXVI. Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga.
Palavestra, Aleksandar. 1983. Arheologija kao avantura. Arheo 3: 37-39.
Palavestra, Aleksandar. 2011. U službi kontinuiteta. Etno-arheologija u Srbiji. Etnoantropološki problemi 6 (3): 579-594.
Parović-Pešikan, M. 1994. „Skitski elementi u gvozdenom dobu Podunavlјa i centralnog Balkana“. U Kulture gvozdenog doba Jugoslovenskog Podunavlјa, ur. Nikola Tasić, 101-110. Beograd: Balkanološki institut SANU.
Said, Edvard. 2008. Orijentalizam. Beograd: XX vek.
Schablitsky, Julie M. (ed.) 2007. Box Office Archaeology: Refining Hollywood's Portrayals of the Past. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Silberman, Neil. 1995. “Promised Lands and Chosen Peoples: The Politics and Poetics of Archaeological Narratives”. In Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology. eds. Philip Kohl and Clare Fawcett, 249-262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shanks, Michael. 1992. Experiencing the Past. London: Routledge.
Shanks, Michael. 2001. „Culture/archaeology: the dispersion of a discipline and its objects”. In Archaeological Theory Today, ed. Ian Hodder, 284-305. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Slučajevski, Konstantin. 1892. Arheolog. Javor 30: 467-469
Srejović, Dragoslav. 1999. Prazno polјe. (razgovor vodila Ildi Ivanji, treće dopunjeno izdanje). Beograd: Ars Libri.
Srejović, Dragoslav. 2001. Iskustva prošlosti. Beograd: Ars libri.
Vasiljević, Vera. 2012. Princess Ru and Papyrus. Sterotypes on Ancient Egypt in graphic novels. Etnoantropološki problemi 7(3): 763-792.
Vasunia, Phiroze. 2010. “Alexander Sikandar”. In Classics and national cultures, eds. Susan A. Stephens and Phiroze Vasunia, 302–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Winter, Tim. 2002. Angkor Meets Tomb Raider: setting the scene. International Journal of Heritage Studies 8: 323-336.
Žikić, Bojan, 2010a. Antropološko proučavanje popularne kulture. Etnoantropološki problemi n.s. 5(2):17-39.
Žikić, Bojan. 2010b. Predgovor za Naš svet, drugi svetovi. Antropologija, naučna fantastika i kulturni identiteti, ur. Bojan Žikić, 1-7. Beograd: Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu – Srpski genealoški centar.
Živković, Marko. 2011. Serbian Dreambook. National Imaginary in the Time of Milošević. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Published
2013-09-17
How to Cite
Bandović, Aleksandar. 2013. “Archaeology on Screen: Representing Archaeology on Film in Serbia”. Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 8 (3), 845-63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v8i3.11.
Issue
Vol 8 No 3 (2013): Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology: Archaeology
Section
Thematic Issue
Copyright (c) 2013 Aleksandar Bandović

All articles in Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which allows authors and users to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the article under the same conditions as in the licence.

The CC BY SA license permits non-commercial and commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.

Copyright on any research article published by Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology is retained by the author(s).

Authors grant to the Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology the right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media. Copyright and source must be acknowledged and a link must be made to the article's DOI.