Contextual Analysis of Fragmentation of the Anthropomorphic Figurines from the Late Neolithic Site of Selevac


  • Marko Porčić Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Serbia



figurines, fragmentation, Late Neolithic, Selevac, context, cultural biography


The biographical approach to material culture and the hypothesis of deliberate fragmentation of anthropomorphic figurines are used in this paper to deduce a hypothesis that there should be an association between particular fragmentation categories and context types in the archaeological record of the Late Neolithic settlements in Central Balkans. This hypothesis is tested using published data from the site of Selevac by performing correspondence analysis and chi-square test on a contingency table in which categories of fragmentation are cross-tabulated with context types. The results are statistically significant, suggesting that complete figurines are associated with houses while transversely broken figurines are associated with pits. There is also evidence that figurines were broken differentially in respect to their original size.


Download data is not yet available.


Baxter, Mike J. 1994. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis in Archaeology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Biehl, Peter F. 2006. „Figurines in Action: Methods and Theories in Figurine Research". In A Future for Archaeology, eds. Robert Layton, Stephen Shennan, and Peter Stone, 199–215. London: UCL Press.

Chapman, John. 2000. Fragmentation in Archaeology: People, Places and Broken Objects in the Prehistory of South Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.

Chapman, John. 2000a. Pit-digging and structured deposition in the Neolithic and Copper Age of Central and Eastern Europe. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 61: 61–87.

Chapman, John. 2000b. "'Rubbish-dumps’ or ‘places of deposition’?: Neolithic and Copper Age settlements in Central and Eastern Europe". In Neolithic Orkney in its European context, ed. Anna Ritchie, 347–362. Cambridge: MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

Chapman, John and Bisserka Gaydarska. 2007. Parts and Wholes: Fragmentation in Prehistoric Context. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

Dimitrijević, Vesna. 2008. Vertebrate Fauna of Vinča – Belo Brdo (Excavation Campaigns 1998–2003). Starinar 56: 245–269.

Gaydarska, Bisserka, John Chapman, Ana Raduntcheva, and Bistra Koleva. 2007. "The châine opératoire approach to prehistoric figurines: an example from Dolnoslav, Bulgaria". In Image and imagination: a global prehistory of figurative representation eds. Colin Renfrew and Iain Morley, 171–184. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

Haberman, Shelby J. 1973. The Analysis of Residuals in Cross-Classified Tables. Biometrics 29: 205-220.

Hutson, Scott R. and Travis W. Stanton. 2007. Cultural Logic and Practical Reason: the Structure of Discard in Ancient Maya Houselots. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17: 123–144.

Jones, Andy. 2005. Lives in Fragments? Personhood and the European Neolithic. Journal of Social Archaeology 5: 193-224.

Kopytoff, Igor. 1986. "The cultural biography of things". In The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective ed. Arjun Appadurai, 64–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lyman, R. Lee. 2008. Quantitative Paleozoology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marcus, Joyce. 1996. The Importance of Context in Interpreting Figurines. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 6: 285-291.

Milenković, Milena and Jelena Arsenijević. 2010. Figurine kao reprezentacije tela: analiza vinčankih figurina gradaćke i pločničke faze sa teritorija kosovske, južnomoravske i srbijanske varijante. Petničke sveske 67: 327–345.

Milojković, Jasmina. 1990. „The Anhtropomorphic and Zoomorphic Figurines". In Selevac. A Neolithic Village in Yugoslavia. eds. Ruth Tringham, and Dušan Krstić, 397–436. Los Angeles: University of California.

Orton, David C. 2010. Taphonomy and interpretation: An analytical framework for social zooarchaeology. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 10.1002/oa.1212

Orton, David. 2008. Beyond Hunting and Herding: Humans, animals, and the political economy of the Vinča period. PhD diss. University of Cambridge.

Schiffer, Michael B. 1976. Behavioral Archeology. New York: Academic Press.

Schiffer, Michael B. 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

Shennan, Stephen. 2004. Quantifying Archaeology. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.

Srejović, Dragoslav. 1968. "Neolitska plastika centralnobalkanskog područja". In Neolit Centralnog Balkana. ed. Lazar Trifunović, 177-233. Beograd: Narodni muzej.

Talalay, Lauren E. 1987. Rethinking the Function of Clay Figurine Legs from Neolithic Greece: An Argument by Analogy. American Journal of Archaeology 91: 161–169.

Tringham, Ruth and Dušan Krstić. 1990a. "Relative and Absolute Chronology". In Selevac: A Neolithic Village in Yugoslavia. eds. Ruth Tringham, and Dušan Krstić, 45–55. Los Angeles: University of California.

Tringham, Ruth and Dušan Krstić (eds.) 1990b. Selevac: A Neolithic Village in Yugoslavia. Monumenta Archaeologica. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.

Ucko, Peter J. 1962. The Interpretation of Prehistoric Anthropomorphic Figurines. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 92: 38–54.

Zorbić, Branka. 2004. „Antropomorfne figurine, žrtvenici, prosopomorfni poklopci". In Grivac: naselja protostarčevake i vinlanske kulture. ed. Milenko Bogdanović, 319–367. Kragujevac: Centar za arheološka istraživanja.

Marko Porčić

Odeljenje za arheologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd




How to Cite

Porčić, Marko. 2012. “Contextual Analysis of Fragmentation of the Anthropomorphic Figurines from the Late Neolithic Site of Selevac”. Etnoantropološki Problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 7 (3):809-27.

Most read articles by the same author(s)