Kontekstualna analiza fragmentacije antropomorfnih figurina sa kasnoneolitskog lokaliteta Selevac
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/EAP.v7i3.11Ključne reči:
figurine, fragmentacija, kasni neolit, Selevac, kontekst, kulturna biografijaApstrakt
Pronalaženje odgovora na pitanje šta su predstavljale i čemu su služile antropomorfne figurine u kasnom neolitu Balkana predstavlja jedan od najtežih zadataka praistorijske arheologije. S obzirom na to da nije moguće samo na osnovu formalnih atributa figurina doći do ovog odgovora, alternativni pristup je da se druge klase arheoloških podataka iskoriste kao uporedni okviri za sagledavanje varijacije formalnih atributa figurina. Ukoliko se u jednu ravan stave koncepcija kulturne biografije predmeta Igora Kopitofa i Čepmenova hipoteza o fragmentaciji kasnoneolitskih antropomorfnih figurina sa područja Balkana, može se dedukovati hipoteza da postoji veza između arheološkog konteksta u kome je figurina pronađena, kao uporednog okvira za trajektoriju upotrebnog ciklusa figurine, i modaliteta njene fragmentacije kao direktnog pokazatelja posledica upotrebe (namernog ili slučajnog lomljenja). Cilj ovog rada jeste da na podacima sa lokaliteta Selevac testira ovu hipotezu. Na tabelu u kojoj su ukršteni podaci o konteksu i fragmentaciji, tj. o zastupljenosti pojedinih kategorija fragmentacije po arheološkim kontekstima, primenjeni su analiza korespondencije i hi kvadrat test. Rezultati ukazuju na to da podaci potkrepljuju osnovnu hipotezu tj. da postoji statistički značajna veza između konteksta i modaliteta fragmentacije. Cele figurine dominiraju u kućama, a transverzalno polomljene figurine u jamama. Takođe, podaci sa Selevca ukazuju na to da je fragmentacija figurina bila pristrasna u odnosu na veličinu figurine – veće figurine su češće fragmentovane od manjih figurina.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Baxter, Mike J. 1994. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis in Archaeology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Biehl, Peter F. 2006. „Figurines in Action: Methods and Theories in Figurine Research". In A Future for Archaeology, eds. Robert Layton, Stephen Shennan, and Peter Stone, 199–215. London: UCL Press.
Chapman, John. 2000. Fragmentation in Archaeology: People, Places and Broken Objects in the Prehistory of South Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.
Chapman, John. 2000a. Pit-digging and structured deposition in the Neolithic and Copper Age of Central and Eastern Europe. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 61: 61–87.
Chapman, John. 2000b. "'Rubbish-dumps’ or ‘places of deposition’?: Neolithic and Copper Age settlements in Central and Eastern Europe". In Neolithic Orkney in its European context, ed. Anna Ritchie, 347–362. Cambridge: MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Chapman, John and Bisserka Gaydarska. 2007. Parts and Wholes: Fragmentation in Prehistoric Context. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Dimitrijević, Vesna. 2008. Vertebrate Fauna of Vinča – Belo Brdo (Excavation Campaigns 1998–2003). Starinar 56: 245–269.
Gaydarska, Bisserka, John Chapman, Ana Raduntcheva, and Bistra Koleva. 2007. "The châine opératoire approach to prehistoric figurines: an example from Dolnoslav, Bulgaria". In Image and imagination: a global prehistory of figurative representation eds. Colin Renfrew and Iain Morley, 171–184. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Haberman, Shelby J. 1973. The Analysis of Residuals in Cross-Classified Tables. Biometrics 29: 205-220.
Hutson, Scott R. and Travis W. Stanton. 2007. Cultural Logic and Practical Reason: the Structure of Discard in Ancient Maya Houselots. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17: 123–144.
Jones, Andy. 2005. Lives in Fragments? Personhood and the European Neolithic. Journal of Social Archaeology 5: 193-224.
Kopytoff, Igor. 1986. "The cultural biography of things". In The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective ed. Arjun Appadurai, 64–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyman, R. Lee. 2008. Quantitative Paleozoology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marcus, Joyce. 1996. The Importance of Context in Interpreting Figurines. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 6: 285-291.
Milenković, Milena and Jelena Arsenijević. 2010. Figurine kao reprezentacije tela: analiza vinčankih figurina gradaćke i pločničke faze sa teritorija kosovske, južnomoravske i srbijanske varijante. Petničke sveske 67: 327–345.
Milojković, Jasmina. 1990. „The Anhtropomorphic and Zoomorphic Figurines". In Selevac. A Neolithic Village in Yugoslavia. eds. Ruth Tringham, and Dušan Krstić, 397–436. Los Angeles: University of California.
Orton, David C. 2010. Taphonomy and interpretation: An analytical framework for social zooarchaeology. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 10.1002/oa.1212
Orton, David. 2008. Beyond Hunting and Herding: Humans, animals, and the political economy of the Vinča period. PhD diss. University of Cambridge.
Schiffer, Michael B. 1976. Behavioral Archeology. New York: Academic Press.
Schiffer, Michael B. 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Shennan, Stephen. 2004. Quantifying Archaeology. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
Srejović, Dragoslav. 1968. "Neolitska plastika centralnobalkanskog područja". In Neolit Centralnog Balkana. ed. Lazar Trifunović, 177-233. Beograd: Narodni muzej.
Talalay, Lauren E. 1987. Rethinking the Function of Clay Figurine Legs from Neolithic Greece: An Argument by Analogy. American Journal of Archaeology 91: 161–169.
Tringham, Ruth and Dušan Krstić. 1990a. "Relative and Absolute Chronology". In Selevac: A Neolithic Village in Yugoslavia. eds. Ruth Tringham, and Dušan Krstić, 45–55. Los Angeles: University of California.
Tringham, Ruth and Dušan Krstić (eds.) 1990b. Selevac: A Neolithic Village in Yugoslavia. Monumenta Archaeologica. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.
Ucko, Peter J. 1962. The Interpretation of Prehistoric Anthropomorphic Figurines. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 92: 38–54.
Zorbić, Branka. 2004. „Antropomorfne figurine, žrtvenici, prosopomorfni poklopci". In Grivac: naselja protostarčevake i vinlanske kulture. ed. Milenko Bogdanović, 319–367. Kragujevac: Centar za arheološka istraživanja.
Marko Porčić
Odeljenje za arheologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca

Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.


