Contribution à la terminologie transdisciplinaire de l’héritage culturel

Auteurs

  • Aleksandra Nikolić Centre for Museology and Heritology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v17i4.13

Mots-clés :

héritologie, héritage culturel, transmission culturelle, terminologie transdisciplinaire, patrimoine, niche culturelle, conservation

Résumé

Dans les deux dernières décennies, les changements dans l’appréhension de l’héritage culturel ont intensifié les tentatives d’établir et de standardiser l’appareil conceptuel de l’héritologie ou de la théorie de l’héritage. Bien que les tentatives de standardisation soient principalement le résultat de l’activité des associations professionnelles ou des organisations internationales qui s’occupent de la protection de l’héritage, elles reflètent aussi des points de vue théoriques nouveaux qui s’insèrent continuellement dans la pratique. Parallèlement aux changements dans la théorie de l’héritage, s’élargissent les possibilités des analyses interdisciplinaires et transdisciplinaires de son objet de recherche. Une telle situation ouvre des questions sur la possibilité de comparaison de la terminologie des disciplines différentes, qui, de manière directe ou indirecte, expriment un intérêt pour les formes et les processus culturels; un tel exemple serait à relever dans des programmes de recherche rassemblés sous le même chapeau de l’évolution culturelle. Pour les besoins d’une analyse terminologique, dans cet article est générée une définition instrumentale de l’héritage culturel ; les principaux éléments de cette définition servent ensuite comme le point d’appui pour un apercu des termes utilisés dans le cadre de l’évolution culturelle et le domaine du patrimoine culturel, et enfin pour la formation des groupes de concepts proches dans les deux domaines. Étant donné le potentiel du champ élargi des recherches héritologiques, et sans ambition d’offrir une terminologie complète et une définition toute faite de l’héritage, ce travail rend compte du besoin d’une synthèse transdisciplinaire du savoir et de l’appareil conteptuel héritologique intégré.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Références

Acerbi, Alex and Alberto Mesoudi. 2015. „If we are all cultural Darwinians what’s the fuss about? Clarifying recent disagreements in the field of cultural evolution“. Biology & philosophy 30 (4): 481-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9490-2

Ahmad, Yahaya. 2006. „The scope and definitions of heritage: from tangible to intangible“. International journal of heritage studies 12 (3): 292-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250600604639

Atran, Scott. 1998. „Folk biology and the anthropology of science: cognitive universals and cultural particulars“. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21: 547–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98001277

Attfield, Judy. 2000. Wild Things. The Material Culture of Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.

Bennett, Tony. 1995. „The Exhibitionary Complex“. In The birth of the museum: History, theory, politics. London: Routledge.

Boyd, Robert and Peter J. Richerson. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Boyer, Pascal. 2001. Religion explained: the evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.

Cavalli-Sforza, Luca Luigi, Marcus W. Feldman, Kuang-Ho Chen, and Sanford M. Dornbusch. 1982.“Theory and observation in cultural transmission.“ Science 218 (4567): 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7123211

Chastel, André. 1988. „Pojam baštine“. Pogledi 3-4 (18): 709-723.

Chick, Garry. 2001. „Culture-Bearing Units and the Units of Culture: An Introduction“. Cross-Cultural Research 35 (2): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939710103500201.

COE (Council of Europe). 2005. „Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society“. Faro: Council of Europe Treaty Series. https://rm.coe.int/1680083746

Creanza, Nicole, Oren Kolodny and Marcus W. Feldman. 2017. „Cultural evolutionary theory: How culture evolves and why it matters“. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (30): 7782-7789. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.162073211

D’Andrade, Roy. 2001. „A Cognitivist’s View of the Units Debate in Cultural Anthropology“. Cross-Cultural Research 35 (2): 242–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939710103500208.

Danchin, Étienne, Anne Charmantier, Frances A. Champagne, Alex Mesoudi, Benoit Pujol, and Simon Blanchet. 2011. „Beyond DNA: Integrating Inclusive Inheritance into an Extended Theory of Evolution“. Nature Reviews Genetics 12 (7): 475–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3028.

Dawkins, Richard. 1982. The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection. San Francisco: Freeman.

Dokins Ričard. 2010. Sebični gen: jubilarno izdanje povodom 30. rođendana knjige. Smeredevo: Heliks.

Häyhä, Heikki, Sari Jantunen and Leena Paaskoski. 2018. Analysing Significance. Publications of Finnish Museums Association 75. https://www.museoliitto.fi/doc/verkkojulkaisut/AnalysingSignificance.pdf

Harrison, Rodney, and Deborah Rose. 2010. „Intangible heritage“ In Understanding heritage and memory, edited by Tim Benton, 238-276. Manchester: Manchester University Press in association with The Open University.

Henrich, Joseph and Richard McElreath. 2003. „The evolution of cultural evolution“. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 12 (3): 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.10110

Jablonka, Eva. 2011. „The Entangled (and Constructed) Human Bank“. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366 (1566): 784–784. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0364.

Laland, Kevin N. 2004. „Extending the extended phenotype“. Biology and Philosophy 19 (3): 313-325. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIPH.0000036113.38737.d8

Laland, Kevin N., John Odling‐Smee, and Marcus W. Feldman. 2001. „Cultural niche construction and human evolution“. Journal of evolutionary biology 14 (1): 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00262.x

Lowenthal, David. 1998. The heritage crusade and the spoils of history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lumsden Charles J. and Edward O. Wilson. 2005. Genes, Mind and Culture- The Coevolutionary Process: 25th Anniversary Edition. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Ltd.

Mesoudi, Alex, Andrew Whiten and Kevin N. Laland. 2004. „Perspective: Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of The Origin of Species“. Evolution 58(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01568.x

Morin, Olivier. 2016. How traditions live and die. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Nikolić, Aleksandra. 2018. „Artefacts in Cultural Transmission: Evolutionary Perspective“. Etnoantropološki problemi 13 (4): 1165–82. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v13i4.12

Odling-Smee, Francis. J. 1988. „Niche-constructing phenotypes“. In The role of behavior in evolution, edited by Henry. C. Plotkin, 73-132. Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.

Pye, Elizabeth. 2001. Caring for the Past: Issues in Conservation for Archaeology and Museums. London: James&James Ltd.

Ricoeur, Paul and John B. Thompson. 2016. Hermeneutics and the human sciences: essays on language, action and interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schönpflug, Ute. 2009. „Theory and Research in Cultural Transmission: A Short History“. In Cultural Transmission: Psychological, Developmental, Social, and Methodological Aspects, edited by Ute Schönpflug, 9–30. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804670.002

Schorch, Philipp. 2014. „Cultural Feelings and the Making of Meaning“. International Journal of Heritage Studies 20 (1): 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.709194.

Sennett, Richard. 2008. „The Troubled Craftsman“. In The Craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press. PDF.

https://archive.designinquiry.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Richard-Sennett-The-Craftsman-Chapter-1.pdf

Smith, Laurajane. 2004. Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203307991.

Smith, Laurajane. 2006. Uses of heritage. London:Routledge.

Sperber, Dan, and Nicolas Claidière. 2008. „Defining and explaining culture (comments on Richerson and Boyd, Not by genes alone)“. Biology & Philosophy 23 (2): 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-9012-8

Sperber, Dan. 1996. Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Taylor, Matthew J. and Candace A. Thoth. 2011. „Cultural Transmission“. In Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development, edited by Sam Goldstein and Jack Naglieri. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_755

Tomasello, Michael, Ann Cale Kruger, and Hilary Horn Ratner. 1993. „Cultural learning“. Behavioral and brain sciences 16 (3): 495-511. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bernard-Schneuwly/publication/247372030_Cultural_learning_is_cultural/links/585cc37608ae8fce48fad7f4/Cultural-learning-is-cultural.pdf

Torre, Marta de la. 2013. „Values and Heritage Conservation“. Heritage & Society 6 (2): 155–66. https://doi.org/10.1179/2159032X13Z.00000000011

Tuđman, Miroslav. 1990. Obavijest i znanje: s rječnikom osnovnih pojmova. Zagreb: Zavod za informacijske studije.

UNESCO. 1972. Konvencija o zaštiti svetske kulturne i prirodne baštine. Pariz: UNESCO.

UNESCO. 2003. Konvencija o očuvanju nematerijalnog kulturnog nasleđa. Pariz: UNESCO.

Wijesuriya, Gamini. 2018. „Living Heritage“. In Sharing Conservation Decisions: Current Issues and Future Strategies, edited by Alison Heritage and Jennifer Copithorne, 43-56. Rome: International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM). https://www.iccrom.org/publication/sharing-conservation-decisions-current-issues-and-future-strategies

Witcomb, Andrea, and Kristal Buckley. 2013. „Engaging with the Future of ‘Critical Heritage Studies’: Looking Back in Order to Look Forward“. International Journal of Heritage Studies 19 (6): 562–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2013.818570.

Whiten, Andrew, Robert A. Hinde, Kevin Laland, and Christopher B. Stringer. 2011. „Culture evolves“. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366 (1567): 938-948. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0372

Téléchargements

Publiée

2022-12-30

Comment citer

Nikolić, Aleksandra. 2022. « Contribution à La Terminologie Transdisciplinaire De l’héritage Culturel ». Problèmes d’ethnologie Et d’anthropologie 17 (4):1431–1448. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v17i4.13.