L'abus des sciences naturelles en (pseudo) archéologie
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21301/EAP.V12I3.8Mots-clés :
archéologie, pseudo archéologie, les sciences naturelles, épistémologie archéologique, archéométallurgie, archéogénétiqueRésumé
Dans les textes pseudo archéologiques, issus de sources marginales ou de la zone grise qui s'apparente à la discipline même de la pseudoscience, on y observe souvent des références aux différentes analyses et méthodes en matière de sciences naturelles qui sont censés renforcer les positions de l'auteur. L'essence même de cette pseudo stratégie consiste à extraire des argumentations et des données archéologiques vérifiables, en les déplaçant sur le terrain glissant d'une complexité mensongère et d'une prétendue multidisciplinarité.
L’épistémologie archéologique suppose que chaque interprétation du passé exige un cadre théorique clair et explicite, des données vérifiables et un rapport dynamique et réciproque en matière de conception et de vérification.
En règle générale, les affirmations pseudo scientifiques ne reposent sur aucun cadre théorique et méthodologique, leurs données proviennent de simples falsifications et vont même jusqu’à des interprétations fantaisistes, basées sur d’authentiques artéfacts. Afin de masquer la faiblesse ou l'inexistence des preuves archéologiques sur lesquelles sont basées ces interprétations, on s'oriente vers des argumentations inextricables dans ce domaine, dont on sait, qu'elles sont moins connues des milieux archéologiques. Par conséquent, il est plus facile de faire passer des certitudes mensongères et infondées.
Téléchargements
Références
Babić, Staša i Miodrag Tomović. 1996. Razgovori o arheologiji. Beograd: 3T.
– – – . 2010. Arheologija i etnicitet. Etnoantropološki problemi 5/1: 139‒147.
– – – . 2011. Čemu još istorija arheologije?. Etnoantropološki problemi 6/3: 565–577.
– – – . 2015. “Theory in Archaeology”. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol. 1, ed. James D. Wright, 899–904. Oxford: Elsevier.
Babović, Ljubinka. 2001. Prilog proučavanju elemenata kalendarografije i hronometrije bronzanog doba južnog Banata. Zbornik Narodnog muzeja 17/1: 53–82.
– – – . 2006. Svetilišta Lepenskog Vira: mesto, položaj i funkcija, Beograd: Narodni muzej.
Bandović, Aleksandar. 2012. Gustaf Kosina i koncept kulture u arheologiji. Etnoantropološki problemi 7/3: 629–648.
Bizjak, Dragica, Dragana Vulović. 2016. „DNK analize humanog osteološkog materijala sa arheoloških lokaliteta“. U Bioarheologija na Balkanu: Metodološke, komparativne i rekonstruktivne studije života u prošlosti, ur. Nataša Miladinović-Radmilović i Selena Vitezović, 5–14. Beograd: Srpsko arheološko društvo.
Borić, Dušan. 2008. „Ljubinka Babović: Sanctuaries of Lepenski vir: Location, position and function, Archaeological monographs 17, National museum, Belgrade, 2006.“ Prikaz knjige. Glasnik Srpskog arheološkog društva 24: 467–477.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2014. Znanost o znanosti i refleksivnost. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.
Bowlus, Charles R. 2002. “Ethnogenesis: The Tyranny of a Concept”. In On Barbarian Identity – Critical Approaches to Ethnicity in the Early Middle Ages, ed. Andrew Gillett, 241‒256. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.
Čatipović, Milivoj. 1980. Podvale obmane i zablude u svjetu nauke. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
Curta, Florin. 2002. “From Kossinna to Bromley: Ethnogenesis in Slavic Archaeology”. In On Barbarian Identity. Critical Approaches to Ethnicity in the Early Middle Ages (Studies in the Early Middle Ages, 4). ed. Andrew Gillett, 201–218. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.
Dokins, Ričard. 2007. Zabluda o bogu. Smederevo: Heliks.
Džino, Danijel. 2014. „Bosanske piramide“: Pseudoarheologija i konstrukcija društvene zbilje u daytonskoj Bosni i Hercegovini. Status, magazin za poliitčku kulturu i društvena pitanja 17: 245–252.
Eco, Umberto. 1995. „Ur-Fascism“. The New York review of Books (June 22nd, 1995). http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/ (pristupljeno 20. jun 2017.).
Eriksen, Tomas Hilan. 2004. Etnicitet i nacionalizam. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.
Fagan, Garrett G. 2006. „Diagnosing pseudoarchaeology“. In Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public, ed. Garrett G. Fagan, 23–46. London: Routledge.
Fajerabend, Paul. 1994. Nauka kao umetnost. Novi sad: Matica Srpska.
Feder, Keneth. 2001. Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries. Boston: McGraw –Hill, Mayfeld.
Fleming, Nic. 2006. “The attraction of non-rational archaeological hypothesis: the individual and sociological factors”. In Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public, ed. Garrett G. Fagan, 47–70. London: Routledge.
Fuller, Steve. 1999. The Governance of Science: Ideology and the Futuure of the Open Society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Fuller, Steve. 2015. Knowledge: the philosophical quest in history. London: Routledge.
Garašanin, Milutin. 1973. Praistorija na tlu SR Srbije. Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga.
– – – . 1983. „Vatinska grupa“. U Praistorija jugoslavenskih zemalja IV, bronzano doba, ur. Alojz Benac, 504–519. Sarajevo: Svijetlost.
Geary, Patrik. 2007. Mit o nacijama: srednjovekovno poreklo Evrope. Novi Sad: Cenzura.
Gillett, Andrew (ed.) 2002. On Barbarian Identity. Critical Approaches to Ethnicity in the Early Middle Ages (Studies in the Early Middle Ages, 4). Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.
Goldejker, Ben. 2012. Loša nauka. Smederevo: Heliks.
Gramsch, Alexander. 2011. “Theory in Central European Archaeology: dead or alive?”. In The Death of Archaeological Theory? eds. John Bintliff and Mark Pearce, 48–71. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Heking, Ijan. 2012. Društvena konstrukcija, ali čega? Novi Sad: Mediterran publishing.
Hen, Volfram i Ekart Mese. 2011. Ljudska genetika. Beograd: Laguna.
Hutchinson, John & Anthony D. Smith (eds.) 1996. Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jakšić, Branka. 2017. „Na keramici sve piše“. Politika Magazin 1002, 11. Decembar 2016, 27.
Janković, Marko. 2016. U potrazi za Adamom Oršićem kroz arheologiju XX veka. Etnoantropološki problemi 11/3: 853–867.
Jones, Martin. 2002. The Molecule Hunt. Archaeology and the Search for Ancient DNA. London: Penguin books.
Jones, Siân. 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London: Routledge.
Jordan, Paul. 2006. “Esoteric Egypt”. In Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology
Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public, ed. Garrett G. Fagan, 109–128. London: Routledge.
Karl, Raimund. 2015. To observe and define is to know: Transfer of Epistemology into and in Archaeology (nepublikovano).
Klejn, Leo. 2012. Soviet Archaeology: Schools, Trends, and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kljosov, Anatolij. 2013. Poreklo Slovena i osvrti na DNK genealogiju. Novi Sad: Miroslav.
Kolarić, Miordrag (ur.) 1972. Bronzano doba Srbije. Beograd: Narodni muzej.
Kosso, Peter. 2006. “Introduction: The Epistemology of Archaeology”. In Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public, ed. Garrett G. Fagan, 3–22. London: Routledge.
Kristiansen, Kristian. 2014. Towards a New Paradigm? The Third Science Revolution and its Possible Consequences in Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology 22: 11–34.
Kun, Tomas. 1974. Struktura naučnih revolucija. Beograd: Nolit.
Latour, Bruno and Woolgar Steve. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lefkowitz, Mary. 2006. “Archeology and the politics og origins: the search for pyramids in Greece”. In Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public, ed. Garrett G. Fagan, 180–202. London: Routledge.
Levitt, Norman. 2006. „The colonization of the past and the pedagogy of the future“. In Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public, ed. Garrett G. Fagan, 259–285. London: Routledge.
Manias, Chris. 2013. Race, Science and the Nation: Reconstructing the Ancient past in Britan, France and Germany, 1800‒1914. London: Taylor and Francis.
Manojlović-Nikolić, Vesna i Vladimir D. Mihajlović. 2016. Pseudo-istorija/arheologija i globalizacija: primer ex Yu prostora. Etnoantropološki problemi 11/4: 1055–1072.
Merlini, Marco. 2005. Semiotic approach to the features of the “Danube script”. Documenta
Praehistorica XXXII: 233-251.
Milosavljević, Monika. 2015. Koncept drugosti varvarstva i varvarizacije u srpskoj arheologiji. Doktorska dis. Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozfski fakultet.
Mirković, Svetislav. 2015. „Otkriveno keltsko svetilište u Velikom Gradištu“. Blic 19. maj. Pristupljeno 20. jun 2017. http://www.blic.rs/kultura/vesti/otkriveno- keltsko-svetiliste-u-velikom-gradistu/cjwhycn.
Mos, Džordž. 2005. Istorija rasizma u Evropi. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Novaković, Predrag. 2011. “Archaeology in the New Countries of Southeastern Europe: A Historical Perspective”. In Comparative Archaeologies: A Sociological View of the Science of the Past, ed. Ludomir R. Lozny, 339–461. New York: Springer.
Okasha, Samir. 2004. Filozofija nauke. Sarajevo: Šahinpašić.
Olsen, Bjørnar. 2002. Od predmeta do teksta. Teorijske perspektive arheoloških istraživanja. Beograd: Geopoetika.
– – –. 2012. After Interpretation. Remebering Arcaheology. Current Swedish Archaeology 20: 11–106.
Opra, Ljerka. 2009. „Svedočnastvo u prilog Milankovićeve teorije klime. Praistorijski CD“. Planeta 33, Godina VI, mart-april. Pristupljeno 20. jun 2017. http://www.planeta. org.rs/33/8%20kulturna%20bastina.htm.
Osmanagić, Semir. 2017. „Otkriće Teslinih torzionih polja na bosanskim piramidama“. Pristupljeno 24. januar 2017. Bosnian Pyramid newsletter Pristupljeno 10. Februara 2017. http://piramidasunca.ba/bs/blogovi-3/semir-osmanagic-blog-x/item/11411-otkri%
C4%87e-teslinih-torzionih-polja-na-bosanskim-piramidama-1.html.
Palavestra, Aleksandar. 2010. Izmišljanje tradicije: „vinčansko pismo”. Etnoantropološki problemi 5/2: 239–258.
Pruitt, Tera C. 2011. „Authority and the Production of Knowledge in Archaeology“ PhD diss. Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge.
Radić, Radivoj. 2005. Srbi pre Adama i posle njega. Istorija jeden zloupotrebe: slovo
protiv „novoromantičara”. Beograd: Stubovi kulture.
– – – . 2016. Klio se stidi, protiv zlostavljanja istorijske nauke. Beograd: Evoluta. Richerson, Peter & Robert Boyd 2006. Not by Genes Alone. How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Sardar, Ziauddin. 2001. Thomas Kuhn i ratovi znanosti. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.
Sokal, Alan D. 2006. “Pseudoscience and postmodernism. Antagonists or fellow travelers?” In Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public, ed. Garrett G. Fagan, 287–361. London: Routledge.
Spasić, Ivana. 2007. Bruno Latur, akteri-mreže i kritika kritičke sociologije. Filozofija i društvo 2: 43–72.
Stojadinović, Predrag. 2014. 50 logičkih grešaka za koje treba da znate. Smederevo: Heliks.
Tarasjev, Aleksej. 1999. Biologija i kreacionizam. Beograd: IP Signature.
Tasić, Nikola. 1974. „Bronzano doba“. U Praistorija Vojvodine, ur. Bogdan Brukner, Borislav Jovanović i Nikola Tasić, 185–256. Novi Sad: Institut za izučavanje istorije Vojvodine – Savez arheoloških društava Vojvodine.
Voss, Barbara. 2008. The Archaeology of Ethnogenesis: Race and Sexuality in Colonial San Francisco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
– – – . 2015. What’s New? Rethinking Ethnogenesis in the Archaeology of Colonialism. American Antiquity 80/40: 655–670.
Wright, James (ed.). 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol 1. Orlando (Florida): University of Central Florida.
Žakula, Sonja. 2013. „(Ne) razumeti Darvina: evolucija i konstrukcija granice između lјudi i životinja“. U Kulturna prožimanja: antropološke perspektive, ur. Srđan Radović, 31–50. Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU (Zbornik Etnografskog instituta 28).
Živković, Tibor. 2007. The Golden Seal of Stroimir. Istorijski časopis LV: 23–29.
~ Glineni kolut sa lokaliteta Najeva ciglana kod Pančeva. Postavljeno 2013. Pristupljeno
juna 2017. http://nebeskiprsten9.blogspot.rs/2013/08/glineni-kolut-sa-lokaliteta-najeva.html.
~ Biolog s Harvrda otkriva: “Srbi su najstariji narod i potječu od Noinog sina”. Pristupljeno
~ Naučno dokazano: Srbi najstariji narod iz čijeg gena potiču Hrvati, Bosanci I Arijevci!, Telegraf. Pristupljeno 20. jun 2017. http://www.telegraf.rs/vesti/832272-naucno-dokazano-srbi-najstariji-narod-iz-cijeg-gena-poticu-hrvati-bosanci-i-arijevci.
~ Anatolij Kljosov: Srpski geni najstariji u Evropi, Nova srpska politička misao. Pristupljeno 20. jun 2017. http://www.nspm.rs/hronika/anatolij-kljosov-srpski-geni-najstariji-u-evropi.html?alphabet=l.
~ Srbi ipak nisu najstariji narod?, B92. Pristupljeno 20. jun 2017. http://www.b92.net/ zivot/antitabu.php?yyyy=2013&mm=11&dd=28&nav_id=782946.
~ Rasni kalkulator, Poreklo. Pristupljeno 20. jun 2017. http://www.poreklo. rs/2012/08/05/rasni-kalkulator/.
~ Problematical Theories, Molecular and Cultural Evolution LAB UCL. Pristupljeno 20. jun 2017. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/mace-lab/debunking/theories.
~ DNK demagogija Anatolija Kljosova. Pristupljeno 20. jun 2017. http://trv-science. ru/2015/01/13/dnk-demagogiya-kljosova/.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
