Conceptualisation de la "liaison romantique"
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v3i3.4Mots-clés :
liaison romantique, amour romantique, liaison pure, élites sociales, reproduction sociale, transitionRésumé
Ce travail étudie le phénomène des liaisons romantiques sous plusieurs angles à partir de quelques paradigmes fondamentaux dans les sciences humaines contemporaines. Leurs approches de l’interprétation de ce phénomène sont appliquées ensuite au "modèle" de la liaison romantique, basé sur des interviews recueillies dans une partie de la population belgradoise au cours de l’élaboration de ce concept. Je soutiens qu’aucun cadre interprétatif ne peut complètement expliquer ce phénomène, mais que leur combinaison offre de très utiles aperçus. Cela représente un exemple de la manière dont différents paradigmes dans les sciences humaines peuvent être combinés pour mieux expliquer le phénomène, et non opposés dans le but de se réfuter mutuellement.
Téléchargements
Références
Bakić-Hayden, M. 1995. Nesting Orientalisms: the Case of Former Yugoslavia. Slavic Review, Vol. 54 No. 4: 917-931.
Barkow, J., L. Cosmides and John Tooby (eds.). 1992. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Beck, U. and E. Beck-Gernsheim. 1995. The Normal Chaos of Love. Oxford: Polity Press.
Berlin, B. O. and P. D. Kay. 1969. Basic Color Terms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Homo Academicus. Paris: Minuit.
Bourdieu, P. 1998. Distinction: a Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
Buss, D. 1989. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Testing in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, 1-49.
Buss, D. 1994. The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating. New York: Basic Books.
Buss, D. 1999. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
D’Andrade, R. G. 1984. Cultural Meaning Systems. In: R. Shreder and R. LeVine (eds.) Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self and Emotion. Cambridge: Cambirdge University Press, 88-119.
D’Andrade, R. G. 1992. Schemas and Motivation. In: R. G. D’Andrade and C. Strauss (eds.) Human Motives and Cultural Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23-44.
D’Andrade, R. G. and Claudia Strauss (eds.). 1992. Human Motives and Cultural Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
D'Andrade, R. G. 1995. The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dawkins, R. 2007. The God Delusion. London: Black Swan.
De Rougemont, D. 1983. Love and the Western World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dunbar, R., L. Barrett and John Lycett. 2007. Evolutionary Psychology: a Begginer’s Guide. Oxford: OneWorld Publications.
Evans, M. 1998. ‘Falling in Love with Love is Falling for Make-Believe’: Ideologies of Romance in Post-Enlightenment Culture. Theory, Culture, Society 15, 265-275.
Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Oxford: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Oxford: Polity Press.
Gordy, E. 1999. The Culture of Power in Serbia: Nationalism and the Destruction of Alternatives. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
Gross, N. and Solon Simmons. 2002. Intimacy as a Double-Edged Phenomenon? An Empirical Test of Giddens. Social Forces Vol.81 No. 2, 531-555.
Grupa autora. 1992. Druga Srbija. [Group of authors, 1992. Second Serbia]. Beograd: Beogradski krug.
Holland, D. 1992. How Cultural Systems Become Desire: a Case Study of American Romance. In: Human Motives…,61-89.
Holland, D. and Margaret Eisenhart. 1990. Educated in Romance: Women, Achievement and College Culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Holland, D. and Naomi Quinn (eds.). 1987. Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jamieson, L. 1999. Intimacy Transformed? A Critical Look at the ‘Pure Relation-ship’. Sociology 33 (3), 477–494.
Jankowiak, W.R. and Edward F. Fischer. 1992. A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Romantic Love. Ethnology Vol. 31 No. 2.
Jansen, S. 2005a. Antinacionalizam: etnografija otpora u Beogradu i Zagrebu. Beograd: XX vek. [Antinationalism: an ethnography of resistance in Zagreb and Beograd].
Jansen, S. 2005b. Who’s Afraid of White Socks? Towards a critical understanding of post-Yugoslav urban self-perceptions. Ethnologia Balkanica, Vol. 9, 151-167.
Kronja, I. 2006. New Urban Trends in Serbia, 1990-2004: From Urban Life to Popular Culture and Vice Versa. Ethnologia Balkanica No. 10, 263-278.
Lazić, M. and S. Cvejić. 2006. Changes in the Recruitment Patterns of the Economical and Political Elites in Serbia. Sociologija, Vol. XLVIII, N° 2, 97-112.
Levin, E. 2004. Living Apart Together: A New Family Form. Current Sociology, Vol. 52 No. 2, 223–240.
Quinn, N. 1987. Convergent Evidence for a Cultural Model of American Marriage. In: Holland and Quinn (eds.) 1987, 173-193.
Spasić, I. 2006. ASFALT: The Construction of Urbanity in Everyday Discourse in Serbia. Ethnologia Balkanica Vol. 10, 211-227
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
