Eksplanatorna moć koncepta otelovljenja u antropologiji
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i2.1Ključne reči:
otelovljenje, antropologija, objašnjenje, eksplanatorna moćApstrakt
U sklopu autorovih kumulativnih istraživanja usmerenih na tipove objašnjenja, strukturu objašnjenja i eksplanatorni kapacitet ključnih pojmova u sociokulturnoj antropologiji, u ovom radu je razmotren koncept otelovljenja (engl. embodiment). Relevantnost preispitivanja eksplanatorne moći tog pojma je višestruka, pre svega na interpretativnom, konceptualnom i paradigmatskom planu. Istraživanje pokazuje da pojam otelovljenja – iako vrlo popularan, rado i često korišćen u veoma uticajnim naučnim monografijama i člancima, pa čak i predlagan kao kamen temeljac „nove paradigme za antropologiju“ – poseduje vrlo ograničen eksplanatorni kapacitet. Čini se da njegova upotreba ničim ne doprinosi antopološkoj argumentaciji na planu objašnjenja – ni kumulativno, ni u smislu rekontekstualizacije. Naime, ispostavlja se da se brisanjem reči „embodiment“ iz argumenata koji su podvrgnuti analizi ne bi ništa izgubilo, kao i da antropološki eksplanatorni aparat, koji je razvijan u okviru antropologije tela, antropologije roda i antropologije srodstva – a čija upotreba prethodi savremenim popularnim upotrebama pojma otelovljenja – nema ništa manji domet kad je u pitanju eksplanatorna moć.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1991. „Writing against Culture”. In Recapturing Anthropology, edited by Richard G. Fox, 137–162. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Bošković, Aleksandar. 2017. „Individualizam u antropologiji”. U Individualizam, uredili Suzana Ignjatović i Aleksandar Bošković, 4-25. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka.
Brightman, Robert. 1995. „Forget Culture: Replacement, Transcendence, Relexification“. Cultural Anthropology 10(4): 509–546. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1995.10.4.02a00030
Bruun, Henrik and Langlais, Richard. 2003. „On Embodied Nature of Action“. Acta Sociologica 46(1): 31-49.
Burling, Robbins. 1964. „Cognition and Componential Analysis: God’s Truth or Hocus Pocus?,“ American Anthropologist 66 (1): 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.1.02a00020
Butler, Judith. 1986. „Sex and Gender in Simone de Beauvoir’s Second Sex“. Yale French Studies 72: 35-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2930225
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.
Collier, Fishburne Jane and Junko Sylvia Yananagisako. Gender and Kinship: Essays Toward a Unified Analysis. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Csordas, Thomas J. 1990. „Embodiment as a Paradigm for Anthropology“. Ethos 18(1): 5-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-08286-2_3
Csordas, Thomas J. 1999a. „Embodied Reason“ In Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersections of Nature and Culture, edited by Gail Weiss and Honi Fern Haber, 143-164. New York: Routledge.
Csordas, Thomas J, 1999b. „Body’s Career in Anthropology“. In Anthropological Theory Today, edited by Henrietta L. Moore, 172-205. Cambridge:
Csordas, Thomas J. 2011. „Cultural Phenomenology“. U Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, edited by Frances E. Mascia-Lees, 137-157. Wiley-Blackwell.
D’Andrade, Roy. 1995. The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Desjarlais, Robert and C. Jason Throop. 2011. „Phenomenological Approaches in Anthropology“. Annual Review of Anthropology (40): 87-102.
Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge.
Douglas, Mary. 1970. Natural Symbols.New York: Vintage.
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality: Vol. I, An Introduction, New York: Pantheon Books.
Frake, Chales. 1964. „Notes on Queries in Ethnography“. American Anthropologist 66(3): 132– 145. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00860
Geertz, Clifford. 1966. „Religion as a Cultural System“. In M. Banton (ed.), Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion, 1–46. New York: Praeger.
Godelije, Moris i Panof, Mišel. 2003. „Stvaranje tela“. Kultura 105/106: 27-43.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Harris, Marvin. 1968. The Rise of Anthropological Theory. London: Routlegde.
Hol, Edvard. 1976. Nemi jezik. Beograd: XX vek.
Hymes, Dell H. 1972. Reinventing Anthropology. New York: Pantheon Books.
Ignjatović, Suzana. 2017. „Povezanost metodološkog, kulturnog i političkom individualizma u društvenim naukama“. U Individualizam, uredili Suzana Ignjatović i Aleksandar Bošković, 26-47. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka.
Ignjatović, Suzana i Aleksandar Bošković. 2018. „O mogućnostima naučnog objašnjenja zasnovanog na metodološkom individualizmu u antropologiji“. Etnoantropološki problemi. 13(1): 14-40. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v13i1.1
Ivanović, Zorica i Šarčević, Predrag. 2003. „O statusu tela u antropologiji“. Kultura 105-106: 9-24.
Ivanović, Zorica. 2003. „Pogovor u Antropologija žene i pitanje rodnih odnosa u izmenjenom diskursu antropologije“. U Antropologija žene uredile Žarana Papić i Lydia Sklevicky, 382-435. Beograd: XX vek.
Jackson, Michael. 1983. „Knowlede of the Body“. Man 18(2): 327-345.
Jackson, Michael. 2002. „Familiar and Foreign Bodies“. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 8(2): 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00006
Jarvie, I. C. 1964. „Explanation in Social Science“. The British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 15(57): 62–72.
Jarvie, I. C. 1976. „On the Limits of Symbolic Interpretation in Anthropology“. Current Anthropology 17(4): 687– 701.
Jarvie, I. C. 1983. „Rationality and Relativism“. The British Journal of Sociology 34(1): 44–60.
Johnson, Mark L. 1999. „Embodied Reason“, In Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersections of Nature and Culture, edited by Gail Weiss and Honi Fern Haber, 81-102. New York: Routledge.
Kapferer, Bruce. 2007. „Anthropology and the Dialectic of Enlightenment: A Discourse on the Definition and Ideals of a Threatened Discipline“. The Australian Journal of Anthropology 18(1): 72-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-9310.2007.tb00078.x
Kovačević, Ivan. 2006. „Individualna antropologija ili antropolog kao lični guslar“. Etnoantropološki problemi 1(1): 18-34. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v1i1.1
Kovačević, Ivan. 2008. „Postkulturni udarac u Vernikeovu zonu“. Antropologija 5: 56-64.
Kulenović, Nina. 2014. „Metodološki individualizam nasuprot metodološkom holizmu. Istorijska pozadina, relevantnost i implikacije (nerešive?) rasprave u sporu oko eksplanatornog kapaciteta i naučnog statusa sociokulturne antropologije“. Etnoantropološki problemi 9(2): 310-333. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v9i2.3
Kulenović, Nina. 2015. „Da li je antropologija ʽnaučnaʼ ili ʽistorijska ʼdisciplina?: pouke iz povesti rane američke antropologije.“ Antropologija 15(2): 47-85.
Kulenović, Nina. 2016. Objašnjenje u antropologiji: istorijski kontekst, (Biblioteka Etnoantropološki problemi, Monografije, knj. 4). Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Centar za antropologiju javnih i praktičnih politika: Dosije studio.
Kulenović, Nina. 2017. Objašnjenje u antropologiji: polemike (Biblioteka Etnoantropološki problemi, Monografije, knj. 5). Beograd: Univerzitet, Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Centar za antropologiju javnih i praktičnih politika: Dosije studio.
Kulenović, Nina. 2019. „Koncept kulture između prosvetiteljstva i kontraprosvetiteljstva.“ Etnoantropološki problemi 14(1): 137-167. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v14i1.6
Little, Daniel. 1991. Varieties of Social Explanation. San Francisco: Westview Press.
Lock, Margaret.1993. „Cultivating the Body“. Annual Review of Anthropology 22; 133-155. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.22.100193.001025
Mascia-Lees, Frances. 2016. „The Body and Embodiment in the History of Feminist Anthropology; An Idiosyncratic Excursion through Binaries“. In Mapping Feminist Anthropology In the Twenty-First Century, edited by Ellen Lewin and Leni M. Silverstein,146-167. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Masquelier, Adeline. 1997. „Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self“. Ethnologist 24(4): 940-941. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1997.24.4.940
Meynell, Letitia. 2009. „Introduction: Minding bodies“. In Embodiment and Agency, 1-25, edited by Sue Campbell, Letitia Meynell and Susan Sherwin. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Milenković, Miloš. 2003. Problem etnografski stvarnog. Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar.
Milenković, Miloš. 2006. „Šta je (bila) antropološka refleksivnost? Metodološka formalizacija“. Etnoantropološki problemi 1(2): 157-184. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v1i2.9
Milenković, Miloš. 2014. Antropologija multikulturalizma: Od politike identiteta ka očuvanju kulturnog nasleđa. Beograd: Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta i Srpski genealoški centar.
Mos, Marsel. [1934]1983. Sociologija i antropologija. Beograd: XX vek.
Obeyesekere, Gananath. 1990. The Work of Culture. Chicago: Chicago Univerity Press.
Ortner, Sherry B. 1984. „Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties“. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26(1): 126-166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500010811
Papić, Žarana i Sklevicky Lydia (ur.). 2003. Antropologija žene. Beograd: XX vek.
Reyna. S. P. 1994. „Literary Anthropology and the Case against Science“. Man 29(3): 555– 581.
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy and Lock, Margaret. 1987. „The Mindful Body: A Prolegomenon to Future Work In Medical Anthropology“. Medical Anthropology Quaterly 1(1): 6-41. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1987.1.1.02a00020
Shankman, Paul. 1984. „The Thick and the Thin: On the Interpretive Theorietical Program of Clifford Geertz“. Current Anthropology 25(3): 261–280.
Simonsen, Kirsten. 2005. „Bodies, Sensations, Space and Time: Contribution from Henri Lefebvre“. Geografiska Annaler 87(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2005.00174.x
Sinđelić, Svetozar. 2010. „Kantovski obrt u savremenoj filozofoiji nauke“. Theoria 3: 5– 36.
Spasić, Ivana. 2005. „Prevoditi i pisati sociologiju“. Mostovi 131-132: 168-178.
Srdić, Anđa. 2008. „Telo i telesnost u antropološkoj perspektivi“. GEM 72: 93-105.
Strathern, Andrew J. and Pamela J. Stewart. 2011. „Personhood“. In Frances E. Mascia-Lees (ed.), A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, 388-403. Willey-Blackwell.
Strauss, Claudia and Quinn, Naomi. 1997. A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, Terence. 1990. „On Structure and Entropy: Theoretical Pastiche and the Contradictions of Structuralism“. Current Anthropology 31(5): 563-568.
Turner, Terence. 1994. „Bodies and anti-bodies: flesh and fetish in contemporary social theory“. In T.J. Csordas (ed.), Embodiment and Experience, 27-47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, Terence. 1995. „Social Body and Embodied Subject“. Cultural Anthropology 10(2): 143-170. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1995.10.2.02a00010
Turner, Terence. 2011. „Bodiliness“. In A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, edited by Frances E. Mascia-Lees, 102-119. Willey-Blackwell.
Tyler, Stephen A. 1969. „Introduction“. In Cognitive Anthropology, edited by Stephen A. Tyler, 1–25. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Van Wolputte, Steven. 2004. „Hang on to Your Self: Of Bodies, Embodiment, and Selves“. Annaual Review of Anthropology 33: 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143749
Wallace, Anthony F. C.. and John Atkins. 1960. „The Meaning of Kinship Terms“. American Anthropologist. 62(1): 58– 80. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1960.62.1.02a00040
Wallace, Anthony F. C. 1965. „The Problem of Psychological Validity of Componential Analysis“. American Anthropologist 67(5): 22– 248. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1965.67.5.02a00800.
Žikić, Bojan. 2002. Antropologija gesta. Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar.
Žikić, Bojan. 2008. „Kako složiti babe, žabe i električne gitare: uvod u kognitivnu antropologiju“. Antropologija 6: 114-136.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2021 Nina Kulenović
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
