Otpakivanje neotpakovanog. Život i budućnost arheoloških zbirki
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v13i3.2Ključne reči:
arheologija, kustoska kriza u arheologiji, arheološko nasleđe, upravljanje zbirkama, muzeji, otpis predmetaApstrakt
Usled snažnog uticaja heritoloških koncepata i zabrinutosti za budućnost nasleđa, dolazi do sve veće muzealizacije prošlosti i nekontrolisanog priliva kulturnih dobara u muzeje. Posledično, sve veći broj muzeja izražava zabrinutost za budućnost zbirki koje se nalaze u, sada već prepunim, depoima.
U pogledu velike količine materijala, posebnu kategoriju čine arheološke zbirke koje se od drugih razlikuju prema načinu prikupljanja i dinamici rasta predmeta unutar muzejskog fonda. Postojeći pristupi prikupljanja arheoloških zapisa podrazumevaju nepredvidiv godišnji rast i samim tim predstavljaju neodrživ koncept dugročnog upravljanja arheološkim nasleđem. Posledica ovakvog stanja jeste zapostavljenost prikupljenih nalaza u fazama nakon iskopavanja, kao vitalnog dela „života“ arheoloških predmeta. Istovremeno, nepregledni redovi nedostupne građe ukazuju na profesionalni horror vacui, strah da se određeni dokaz ili trag izgubi iz procesa sagledavanja prošlosti ili pak na težnju da se održi imperativ očuvanja nasleđa za buduće generacije. Usled neuređenosti procesuiranja arheoloških ostataka postavlja se pitanje kako tradicije prikupljanja i organizovanja artefakata utiču na vrednosnu ocenu arheoloških zapisa i formiranja slike o prošlosti. Imajući u vidu navedeno, rad predstavlja kritički osvrt na problem dugoročnog upravljanja arheološkim materijalom i zbirkama u muzejima i drugim srodnim institucijama. Pored toga, biće razmotreni i mogući pravci promena praksi korišćenja i redefinisanja vrednosti „neotpakovanog“ arheološkog nasleđa.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Andrejević-Kun, Nada. 1948. Zadaci muzeja u novim društvenim uslovima u našoj zemlji. Muzeji 1: 1–4.
Anon. 2011. https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/ICCROM-UNESCO%20International%20Storage%20Survey%202011_en.pdf, pristupljeno 12. 3. 2018.
Avrami E. et. al. 2000. „Report on Research“. In Values and Heritage Conservation. ed. Erica
Avrami, Randall Mason, Marta de la Torre, 3–11. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
Bošković, Đurđe. 1983. „Razvoj arheološke nauke posle oslobođenja“. U Spomenica Srpskog arheološkog društa, 1883–1983, ur. Nikola Tasić, 41–75. Beograd: Srpsko arheološko društvo.
Ber, Vivijen. 2001. Uvod u socijalni konstrukcionizam. Beograd: Zepter Book World.
Babić, Staša. 2011. Čemu još istorija arheologije? Etnoantropološki problemi 6(3): 565–577.
Brown, Duncan. 2007. Archaeological Archives. A guide to best practice in creation, compilation, transfer and curation. http://www.archaeologyuk.org/archives/Archives_Best_Practice.pdf , pristupljeno 15. 5. 2018.
Carman, John. 2010. “Promotion to heritage: How museum objects are made”. In. Encouraging Collections Mobility – A Way Forward for Museums in Europe Susanna Pettersson, Monika Hagedorn-Saupe, Teijamari Jyrkkiö, Astrid Weij (ed.), 74–85. http://www.lending-for-europe.eu/fileadmin/CM/public/handbook/Encouraging_Collections_Mobility_A4.pdf, pristupljeno 21. 3. 2015.
Childs, Terry S. 1995 Curation Crisis—What's Being Done? Federal Archeology 7 (4):11–15
– – – . 2006 “Archaeological Collections: Valuing and Managing an Emerging Frontier”. In Of the Past, for the Future: Integrating Archaeology and Conservation, edited by Agnew, Neville and Bridgland, Janet, 204–210. Los Angeles: .Getty Conservation Institute.
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2014. Predmeti ili narativi. Arheološke postavke u Srbiji: utemeljenje muzejske arheologije. Etnoantropološki problemi 9(3): 577–596.
– – – . 2015a. Predmeti ili narativi. Arheološke postavke u Srbiji: doba artefakata. Etnoantropološki problemi 10(3): 557–593.
– – – . 2015b. Dunavski limes u Srbiji: Uloga muzeja u interpretaciji i promociji granica Rimskog carstva. Zbornik Narodnog muzeja XXII-1: 363–383.
Daglas, Meri. 2001. Kako institucije misle. Beograd: Fabrika knjiga.
Garašanin, Milutin. 1983. „Srpsko arheološko društvo od 1883–1983“. U Spomenca Srpskog arheološkog društva 1883-1983, ur. Nikola Tasić, 9–16. Beograd: Srpsko arheološko društvo
Gavrilović, Ljiljana. 2006. Muzeologija u vakumu. Etnoantropološki problemi 1(2): 45–58.
– – – . 2008. „Muzeji i geografije (nacionalne) moći“. U Muzeji u Srbiji: započeto putovanje.
Gavrilović, Ljiljana i Marko Stojanović (ur.), 33–45. Beograd: Muzejsko društvo Srbije.
– – – . 2009. Muzeologija i antropologija: Ukrštanje puteva. Antropologija 9: 29–39.
Grin, Kevin. 2003. Uvod u arheologiju. Beograd: Clio.
Edgeworth, Matt. 2011. Excavation as a ground of archaeological knowledge. Archaeological Dialogues 18 (1): 44–46.
Ellis, Linda. 2004. “Museum Studies”. In. A Companion to Archaeology, ed. John Bintliff, 454–472. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fagan, B., 1995. Archaeology’s dirty secret. Archaeology 48: 14–17.
Harrison, Rodney. 2013. Forgetting to remember, remembering to forget: late modern heritage practices, sustainability and the ‘crisis’ of accumulation of the past. International Journal of Heritage Studies19 (6): 579–595.
Högberg, Anders, Cornelius Holtorf, Sarah May & Gustav Wollentz. 2018. No Future in Archaeological Heritage Management? World Archaeology 49: 1–9.
Holtorf, Cornelius. 2014. “Preservation Paradigm in Heritage Management.” In The Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, edited by C. Smith, 6128–6131. New York: Springer.
– – – . 2018. Conservation and heritage as future-making. ICOMOS University Forum. pp. 1–13. http://openarchive.icomos.org/1857/1/6_Holtorf.pdf , pristupljeno 2. 8. 2018.
Holtorf, Cornelius and Anders Högberg. 2013. “Heritage futures and the Future of Heritage”. In Counterpoint: Essays in Archaeology and Heritage Studies in Honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen. eds. S. Bergerbrant and S. Sabatini, 739–746. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Karl, Raimund. 2015. “Every sherd is sacred: Compulsive hoarding in archaeology”. In
Managing the Archaeological Heritage: Public archaeology in Europe 3, eds. Ghattas J. Sayej, Donald Henson and Yvonne F. Williumsen, 24-37. Kristiansand: Vest-Agder-Museet.
Knell, Simon (ed.) 2007. Museums in the Material World. London: Routledge.
Kopitoff, Igor. 1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process”. In The Social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective,ed. Arjun Appadurai, 64–93, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lucas, Gavin. 2001. Critical Approaches to Fieldwork: Contemporary and Historical Archaeological Practice. London: Routledge.
– – – . 2002. Disposability and Dispossession in the Twentieth Century. Journal of material culture 7(1): 5–22
Marquardt, William, Antaa Montet-White, and Sandra C. Scholtz. 1982. Resolving the Crisis in Archaeological Collections Curation. American Antiquity. 47(2): 409–418.
Meijer-van Mensch, Léontine & Peter van Mensch. 2010. “From disciplinary control to co-creation – Collecting and the development of museums as praxis in the nineteenth and twentieth century” In. Encouraging Collections Mobility – A Way Forward for Museums in Europe, ed. by Susanna Pettersson, Monika Hagedorn-Saupe, Teijamari Jyrkkiö, Astrid Weij, 34–57. http://www.lending-for-europe.eu/fileadmin/CM/public/handbook/Encouraging_Collections_Mobility_A4.pdf, pristupljeno 21. 3. 2015.
Miller, Mark E.1999. Key Issues in Archaeological Collections Management. Museum Anthropology 23(2): 6–8.
Miller, Steven. 2006. Museum Storage: Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Museum News 85(1): 57–59.
Mrđić, Nemanja, Vesna Bikić, Dragana Antonović, Milica Radišić, Slaviša Perić. 2017. „Arheološka istraživanja u Đerdapu“. U Mnemosynon Firmitatis. Sedamdeset godina Arheološkog instituta, ur. Vesna Bikić i Josip Šarić, 67–84. Beograd: Arheološki institut.
Novaković, Predrag. 2011. “Archaeology in the New Countries of Southeastern Europe: A Historical Perspective”. In Comparative Archaeologies: A Sociological View of the Science of the Past, ed. Ludomir R. Lozny, 339–461. New York: Springer
Olsen, Bjørnar. 2002. Od predmeta do teksta. Teorijske perspektive arheoloških istraživanja. Beograd: Geopoetika.
Olsen, Bjørnar, Michael Shanks, Timothy Webmoor, Christopher Witmore. 2012. Archaeology: The Discipline of Things. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Palavestra, Aleksandar. 2011. Kulturni konteksti arheologije. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu.
Palavestra, Aleksandar i Monika Milosavljević. 2015. Delo Jovana Cvijića i Vladimira Dvornikovića kroz prizmu srpske arheologije. Etnoantropološki problemi 10(3): 619–649.
Richmond, Alison and Alison Bracker (eds). 2009. Conservation, Principles, Dilemmas and Uncomfortable Truths. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Smith, Laurejane. 2006. The Uses of heritage. New York: Routledge.
Swain, Hedley. 2007. An Introduction to Museum Archaeology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, Karen. 2014. “Handling the ’Curation Crisis:’ Database Management for Archaeological Collections”. Master thesis; Seton Hall University.
Thompson, Michael 1979. Rubbish Theory: the Creation and Destruction of Value. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ucko, Peter J. 1995. “Archaeological Interpretation in a World Context“. In Theory in Archaeology. World Perspective, ed. Peter J. Ucko, 1–27. London: Routledge.
Voss, Barbara. 2012. Curation as research. A case study in orphaned and underreported archaeological collections. Archaeological Dialogues 19 (2):145–169.
Vasić, Rastko. 2017. „Arheološki institut i arheologija u Srbiji“. U Mnemosynon Firmitatis. Sedamdeset godina Arheološkog instituta. ur. Vesna Bikić i Josip Šarić, 8–14. Beograd: Arheološki institut.
Viñas, Muñoz Salvador. 2005. Contemporary theory of conservation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Zetterström-Sharp, Johanna. 2015. Heritage as Future-Making: Aspiration and Common Destiny in Sierra Leone. International Journal of Heritage Studies 21(6): 609–627.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2018 Autori
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
