Compatibility of UNESCO and Council of Europe Cultural Heritage Concepts

  • Jelena Ćuković Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v14i4.7
Keywords:
cultural heritage, UNESCO, Council of Europe, conventions

Abstract

The same year that UNESCO adopted the Convention for the Protection of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, the Republic of Serbia became a member of the Council of Europe. The protection of the intangible and cultural heritage in the Republic of Serbia is done according to the regulations of these two institutions. This paper is based on a comparative analysis of two (for intangible) cultural heritage, the most important documents of individual institutions: the 2003 UNESCO Convention on the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity and the 2005 Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society. The aim of the paper is to compare the cultural conceptions of UNESCO and the Council of Europe, and to show whether there are differences in the cultural policies of one global and one European institution in this field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aykan, Bahar. 2014. „Whose Tradition, Whose Identity? The politics of constructing 'Nevruz' as intagible heritage in Turkey.“ European Journal of Turkish Studies 2 (19): 1-13.

Brown, Oli. 2005. EU Trade Policy and Conflict. Manitoba: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

Brujić, Marija. 2016. Evropeizacija u Srbiji početkom XXI veka. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Etnoantropološki problemi - Monografije.

Drača Muntean, Asja. 2011. „Potvrđivanje i implementacija UNESKO-ve konvencije o nematerijalnom kulturnom nasleđu u Republici Srbiji.“ Centar za zaštitu nematerijalnog kulturnog nasleđa, Nematerijalno nasleđe Srbije br. 1, 26-27.

Etinski, Rodoljub. 2013. Potreba redefinisanja pojma ljudskih prava. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet.

Gačanović, Ivana. 2009. Problem evropskog identiteta. Uvod u antropologiju Evropske unije. Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar – Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta.

Gavrilović, Ljiljana. 2011. „Potraga za osobenošću, izazovi i dileme unutar kocepta očuvanja i reprezentovanja nematerijalnog kulturnog nasleđa“ Etnoantropološki problemi 6 (2): 221-234.

Krstanović Lukić, Miroslava i Zorica Divac. 2012. „Programiranje nematerijalnog kulturnog nasleđa grada“. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU LX (2): 9-23.

Samadi Rendi, Leila. 2008. „Final Report of Second Coordinating Meeting of the Countries Celebrating Nowrouz Preparation of Nowrouz Multi-National File.“ Milli Folklor 20 (79): 110-111.

Taylor, Mary. 2009. „Intangible Heritage governance, cultural diversity, ethno-nationalism.“ Focaal 55 (2): 41-58.

Tunbridge, John and Graham Ashworth. 1996. Dissonant heritage: the management of the past as a resource in conflict. Wiley.

Zechenter, Elizabeth. 1997. „In the Name of Culture: Cultural Relativism and the Abuse of Individual Author(s).“ Journal of Anthropological Research 53(3): 123-145.
Published
2020-01-05
How to Cite
Ćuković, Jelena. 2020. “Compatibility of UNESCO and Council of Europe Cultural Heritage Concepts”. Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 14 (4), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v14i4.7.
Issue
Vol 14 No 4 (2019): Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology
Section
Scientific Articles

All articles in Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which allows authors and users to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the article under the same conditions as in the licence.

The CC BY SA license permits non-commercial and commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.

Copyright on any research article published by Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology is retained by the author(s).

Authors grant to the Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology the right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media. Copyright and source must be acknowledged and a link must be made to the article's DOI.