Šesti hodnik: Kontekstualizacija serijala Kosmos: Odiseja prostor-vremenom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v17i1.2Ključne reči:
hegemonija, formula, Kosmos, kulturni rat, klimatske promene, kreacionizam, popularna naukaApstrakt
Tekst pruža okvir za razumevanje uloge popularne nauke u domenu kulturnih ratova koji se trenutno odvijaju u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama, ali i na drugim mestima na Zapadu. U prvi plan smeštena je politička instrumentalizacija serije Kosmos, kao narativa koji u sebi sadrži određeni set filozofskih i kulturološki relevantnih poruka. Opisani su osnovni koncepti koji doprinose razumevanju takve pozicije popularne nauke u savremenom svetu, kao što je analizirana formula jedne sezone serije. Pored toga, predstavljena je kritika serijala koja dolazi iz domena kreacionističkog diskursa, kao nevelikog, ali izuzetno aktivnog društvenog pokreta u Americi. To je učinjeno s ambicijom da se sagledaju moć i značaj poruka utkanih u naučno-popularne narative.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Bergman. Tabe. 2018. „American Television: Manufacturing Consumerism“. U The Prpaganda Model Today: Filtering Perception and Awareness, edited by Joan Pedro-Carañana, Daniel Broudy and Jeffery Klaehn, 159-172. London: University of Westminster Press.
Broks, Peter 2006. Understanding Popular Science. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Cawelti, John G. 1974. „Myth, Symbol, And Formula“. Journal of Popular Culture 8 (1): 1-9.
Cawelti, John G. 1969. „The Concept of Formula in the Study of Popular Literature“. The Journal of Popular Culture 3 (3): 381-390.
Shinn, Terry and Richard Whitley, ed, 1985. Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Gitlin, Todd. 1977. „Spotlights and Shadows: Television and the Culture of Politics“. College English 38 (8): 789-801.
Gitlin, Todd. 1979. „Prime Time Ideology: The Hegemonic Process in Television Entertainment“. Social Problems 26 (3): 251-266.
Grejling, Entoni Kliford. 2015. Rasprava o bogu. Beograd: McMilan.
Grant, Barry Keith, ed, 2003. Film Genre Reader III. Austin: University of Texas Press, Austin
Forrest, Barbara. 2008. „Still Creationism after All These Years: Understanding and Counteracting Intelligent Design“. Integrative and Comparative Biology 48 (2): 189- 201.
Franklin, Sarah. 1996. „Making Transparencies: Seeing through the Science Wars“. Social Text 46: 141-155.
Bucchi, Massimiano and Brian Trench, ed. 2008. Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London and New York: Routledge.
Đorđević, Jelena (ur). 2009. Studije kulture. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
Hilgartner, Stephen. 1990. „The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses“. Social Studies of Science 20 (3): 519-539.
Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.
King, Kenneth P. 2000. „Educational Television: 'Let's Explore Science'“. Journal of Science Education and Technology 9 (3): 227-246.
Kirby, David A. 2003. „Science Consultants, Fictional Films, and Scientific Practice“. Social Studies of Science 33 (2): 231-268.
Lewenstein, Bruce V. 1987. „Was There Really a Popular Science 'Boom'?“ Science,Technology, & Human Values 12 (2): 29-41.
Neale, Steve. 2003. „Questions of Genre“. U Film Genre Reader III. Edited by Barry Keith Grant, 160-184. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Pedro-Carañana, Joan, Daniel Broudy and Jeffery Klaehn (eds). 2018. The Propaganda Model Today: Filtering Perception and Awareness. London: University of Westminster Press.
Schatz, Thomas. 2003. „The Structural Influence: New Directions in Film Genre Study“. U Film Genre Reader III, edited by Barry Keith Grant, 92-102. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Storey, John. 2003. Cultural Studies and the Study of Popular Culture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Stjuart, Hol. 2009. „Kodiranje, dekodiranje“. U Studije kulture, uredila Jelena Djordjević, 275-285.Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Tomašević, Milan. 2014. „Značenje razaranja. Određenje i kontekstualizacija filma katastrofe“. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 63 (1): 199-214.
Tomašević, Milan. 2020. Kosmologika: kontekstualizacija popularne kosmologije. Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU.
Whitley, Richard. 1985. „Knowledge Producers and Knowledge Acquirers: Popularisation as a Relation Between Scientific Fields and Their Publics“. U Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation, edited by Terry Shinn and Richard Whitley, 3-28. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Zakarya, Nasser. 2015. „Exhibiting Cosmos“. Technology and Culture. 56 (3): 738-744.
Sources:
Dan Arel. "13 ways Neil deGrasse Tyson's "Cosmos" sent the religious right off the deep end". 14. June 2014. https://www.salon.com/2014/06/14/13_ways_neil_degrasse_tysons_cosmos_sent_the_religious_right_off_the_deep_end_partner/
Casey Luskin. "Cosmos with Neil deGrasse Tyson: Same Old Product, Bright New Packaging". March 10, 2014. https://evolutionnews.org/2014/03/cosmos_with_nei/
Jay W. Richards. "In a Ninth Episode, Marred by the Now Familiar Rigid Ideology, Cosmos Tackles Geology and Climate". May 5, 2014. https://evolutionnews.org/2014/05/in_a_ninth_epis/
Jay W. Richards. "When Ideology Trumps Science: Neil deGrasse Tyson and Cosmos on Global Warming", August 6, 2014, https://evolutionnews.org/2014/08/when_ideology_t/
Seth MacFarlane hopes ‘Cosmos’ counteracts ‘junk science,’ creationism, March 7, 2014, https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-qa-seth-macfarlane-cosmos-science-creationism-20140305-story.html#axzz2vIc9ccMT
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
