Le sixième couloir: Contextualisation de la série Cosmos « Une odyssée à travers l’univers »
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v17i1.2Mots-clés :
science populaire, hégémonie, formule, Cosmos, guerre culturelle, changements climatiques, créationnismeRésumé
Le texte offre un cadre pour la compréhension du rôle de la science populaire dans le domaine des guerres culturelles qui sont en train de se dérouler aux États-Unis, mais aussi dans d'autres endroits en Occident. Au premier plan est située l'instrumentalisation politique de la série Kosmos, comme d'un récit qui contient en soi un certain ensemble de messages philosophiques et pertinents. Sont décrits les concepts fondamentaux qui contribuent à la compréhension culturelle d'une telle position de la science populaire dans le monde contemporain, tout comme a été analysée la formule d'une saison de la série. En outre, a été décrite la critique de la série provenant du domaine du discours créationniste, comme d'un mouvement social nevelikog, mais extrêmement actif en Amérique. Cela a été fait avec l'ambition d'analyser la puissance et l'importance des messages intégrés dans les récits scientifico-populaires.
Téléchargements
Références
Bergman. Tabe. 2018. „American Television: Manufacturing Consumerism“. U The Prpaganda Model Today: Filtering Perception and Awareness, edited by Joan Pedro-Carañana, Daniel Broudy and Jeffery Klaehn, 159-172. London: University of Westminster Press.
Broks, Peter 2006. Understanding Popular Science. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Cawelti, John G. 1974. „Myth, Symbol, And Formula“. Journal of Popular Culture 8 (1): 1-9.
Cawelti, John G. 1969. „The Concept of Formula in the Study of Popular Literature“. The Journal of Popular Culture 3 (3): 381-390.
Shinn, Terry and Richard Whitley, ed, 1985. Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Gitlin, Todd. 1977. „Spotlights and Shadows: Television and the Culture of Politics“. College English 38 (8): 789-801.
Gitlin, Todd. 1979. „Prime Time Ideology: The Hegemonic Process in Television Entertainment“. Social Problems 26 (3): 251-266.
Grejling, Entoni Kliford. 2015. Rasprava o bogu. Beograd: McMilan.
Grant, Barry Keith, ed, 2003. Film Genre Reader III. Austin: University of Texas Press, Austin
Forrest, Barbara. 2008. „Still Creationism after All These Years: Understanding and Counteracting Intelligent Design“. Integrative and Comparative Biology 48 (2): 189- 201.
Franklin, Sarah. 1996. „Making Transparencies: Seeing through the Science Wars“. Social Text 46: 141-155.
Bucchi, Massimiano and Brian Trench, ed. 2008. Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London and New York: Routledge.
Đorđević, Jelena (ur). 2009. Studije kulture. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
Hilgartner, Stephen. 1990. „The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses“. Social Studies of Science 20 (3): 519-539.
Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.
King, Kenneth P. 2000. „Educational Television: 'Let's Explore Science'“. Journal of Science Education and Technology 9 (3): 227-246.
Kirby, David A. 2003. „Science Consultants, Fictional Films, and Scientific Practice“. Social Studies of Science 33 (2): 231-268.
Lewenstein, Bruce V. 1987. „Was There Really a Popular Science 'Boom'?“ Science,Technology, & Human Values 12 (2): 29-41.
Neale, Steve. 2003. „Questions of Genre“. U Film Genre Reader III. Edited by Barry Keith Grant, 160-184. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Pedro-Carañana, Joan, Daniel Broudy and Jeffery Klaehn (eds). 2018. The Propaganda Model Today: Filtering Perception and Awareness. London: University of Westminster Press.
Schatz, Thomas. 2003. „The Structural Influence: New Directions in Film Genre Study“. U Film Genre Reader III, edited by Barry Keith Grant, 92-102. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Storey, John. 2003. Cultural Studies and the Study of Popular Culture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Stjuart, Hol. 2009. „Kodiranje, dekodiranje“. U Studije kulture, uredila Jelena Djordjević, 275-285.Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Tomašević, Milan. 2014. „Značenje razaranja. Određenje i kontekstualizacija filma katastrofe“. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 63 (1): 199-214.
Tomašević, Milan. 2020. Kosmologika: kontekstualizacija popularne kosmologije. Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU.
Whitley, Richard. 1985. „Knowledge Producers and Knowledge Acquirers: Popularisation as a Relation Between Scientific Fields and Their Publics“. U Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation, edited by Terry Shinn and Richard Whitley, 3-28. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Zakarya, Nasser. 2015. „Exhibiting Cosmos“. Technology and Culture. 56 (3): 738-744.
Sources:
Dan Arel. "13 ways Neil deGrasse Tyson's "Cosmos" sent the religious right off the deep end". 14. June 2014. https://www.salon.com/2014/06/14/13_ways_neil_degrasse_tysons_cosmos_sent_the_religious_right_off_the_deep_end_partner/
Casey Luskin. "Cosmos with Neil deGrasse Tyson: Same Old Product, Bright New Packaging". March 10, 2014. https://evolutionnews.org/2014/03/cosmos_with_nei/
Jay W. Richards. "In a Ninth Episode, Marred by the Now Familiar Rigid Ideology, Cosmos Tackles Geology and Climate". May 5, 2014. https://evolutionnews.org/2014/05/in_a_ninth_epis/
Jay W. Richards. "When Ideology Trumps Science: Neil deGrasse Tyson and Cosmos on Global Warming", August 6, 2014, https://evolutionnews.org/2014/08/when_ideology_t/
Seth MacFarlane hopes ‘Cosmos’ counteracts ‘junk science,’ creationism, March 7, 2014, https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-qa-seth-macfarlane-cosmos-science-creationism-20140305-story.html#axzz2vIc9ccMT
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
