Refleksivno mišljenje – zamena za analogiju? Primer debate o antičkoj ekonomiji

Autori

  • Zorica Kuzmanović Odeljenje za arheologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Ljubljani, Slovenija

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v5i1.8

Ključne reči:

arheologija, analoško mišljenje, refleksivnost, premoderna ekonomija, modernost

Apstrakt

Tradicionalne rasprave o analoškom mišljenju koje je u osnovi svih znanja o prošlosti zasnivale su se na naučno-metodološkom postulatu o težnji za povećanjem kontrole uslova koji utiču na istraživačku situaciju, odnosno na premetodološkom konsenzusu o potrebi za objektifikacijom, depersonalizacijom i regulacijom istraživanja. Ostajući privržena  nasleđenim idealima objektivne društvene nauke arheološka diskusija o analogiji bila je decenijama fokusirana isključivo na logičko-epistemološke probleme opšte metodologije, ali je, zapravo, doprinela vrlo malo prevazilaženju činjenice da prošlost nije objektivno saznatljiva.

Uvodeći pojam refleksivnost u diskusiju o analoškoj prirodi arheološkog mišljenja, cilj mi je da rekontekstualizujem debatu o analogiji koja teži pozitivističkim idealima jedne društvene nauke, u debatu o arheologiji kao društvenoj praksi koja neminovno i kontinuirano uspostavlja analogiju između prošlosti i sadašnjosti i tako uspostavlja značenja sveta u kome živimo. Promišljanje arheoloških analogija pojmovnim aparatom razvijenim u antropološkim i sociološkim debatama o refleksivnosti, stvara jednu novu istraživačku perspektivu u kojoj upotreba analogija izlazi iz domena rasprava o logičkoj doslednosti i postaje društvena praksa svesna značenjskih, a otuda i političkim implikacija znanja koje proizvodi.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Reference

Amemiya, Takeshi. 2007. Economy and Economics of Ancient Greece. London: Routledge.

Babić, Staša. 2004. Poglavarstvo i Polis. Beograd: Srpaska akademija nauka i umetnosti – Balkanološki institut.

Babić, Staša. 2008. Grci i drugi. Antička percepcija i percepcija antike. Beograd: Clio.

Ber, Vivijen. 2001. Uvod u socijalni konstrukcionizam. Beograd: ZEPTER BOOK WORLD.

Bourdieu, Pierre and Loïc J. D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Binford, Luis. 1962. Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity 28: 217-225.

Binford, Luis. 1977. General Introduction to For Theory Building in Archaeology: Essays on Faunal Remains, Aquatic resources, Spatial Analysis, and Systemic Modeling ed. L.R. Binford, 1-13. New York: Academic Press.

Binford, Luis. 1978a. On Covering Law and Theories in Archaeology. Current Anthropology 19: 631 – 632.

Binford, Luis. 1978b. Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology. New York: Academic Press.

Binford, Luis. 1981. Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. New York: Academic Press.

Binford, Luis. 1983. In Pursuit of the Past: Decoding the Archaeological Record. New York: Academic Press.

Džonson, Metju. 2008. Arheološka teorija. Beograd: Clio.

David, Nicholas and Kramer, Carol. 2001. Etnoarchaeology in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gould, A. Richard i Patty Jo Watson. 1982. A dialogue on the meaning and use of analogy in ethnoarchaeological reasoning. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 355-381.

Hodder, Ian. 1982. The Present Past. London L.T.Batsford.

Hodder, Ian. 1986. Reading the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hodder, Ian. 1994. Archaeological Process. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hopper, J. Robert. 1979. Trade and Industry in Classical Greece. London: Thames and Hudson.

Gibbon, Gay. 1989. Explanation in Archaeology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Green, Peter. (ed.) 1993. Introduction: New Approaches to the Hellenistic World. Hellenistic History and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Finley, Moses. 1973. The Ancient Economy. London: Chatto & Windus.

Finley, Moses. 1983. Economy and Society in Ancient Greece. London: Pelicane.

Joel, Kahn S. 2001. Anthropology and Modernity. Current Anthropology 42: 651-664.

Keyes, Charles F. 2002. Weber and Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 233-255.

Kobylinski, Zbignew. 1989. Ethno-archaeological cognition and cognitive ethno-archaeology. In The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression, ed. Ian Hodder, 122-129. London: Routledge.

Kuzmanović, Zorica. 2009. Upotreba etnografskih analogija u arheološkom zaključivanju. Etnoantropološki problemi 4 (1): 133-148.

Layton, Robert. 1997. An Introduction to Theory in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McLennan, Gregor. 2006. Sociological Cultural Studies. Reflexivity and Positivity in the Human Science, Hampshire: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN.

Milenković M.. 2006. Šta je (bila) antropološka 'refleksivnost' - metodološka formalizacija. Etnoantropološki problemi, Beograd 1, (2): 157-184.

Miller, Daniel. 1997. Modernity – An Ethnographic Approach. Dualism and Mass Consumption in Trinidad. BERG, Oksford

Morely, Neville. 2009. Antiquity and Moderniti. Oxford: Wiley – Blackwell.

Morris, Ian. 1994. Archaeology of Greece. In Classical Greece: ancient histories and modern archaeologies. ed. Ian Morris, ... Camridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.

Olsen, Bjørnar. 2002. Od predmeta do teksta. Teorijske perspektive arheoloških istraživanja. Beograd: Clio.

Peri, Marvin. 2000. Naučna revolucija: nova kosmologija i metodologija. Intelektualna istorija Evrope, ur. Zoran Hamović, 89-130. Beograd: Clio.

Reger, Gary. 2007. The Economy. In A Companion of the Hellenistic World, ed. Andrew Erskine, 331-335. Oxford: Blackwell.

Rostovtzeff, Mihajl. 1941. Social and Economic History of The Hellenistic World Vol. 1-3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rostovcev, Mihail. 1990. Istorija starog sveta. Novi Sad: Matica Srpska.

Sandri, Serena (ed.) 2009.Reflexivity in Economics. An Experimental Examination on the Self-Referentiality of Economic Theories. Heidelberg : Physica-Verlag.

Sahlins, Marshall. 1976. Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Shanks, Michael and Cristopher Tilley. 1987. Re-constructing Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shipley, Graham. 2000. The Greek World After Alexander 323-30 BC.. London: Routledge.

Smart, Barry. 1999. Facing Modernity. Ambivalence, Reflexivity and Modernity. London: SAGE Publications.

Snodgrass, M. Anthony. 1980. Archaic Greece. The Age of Experiment. Berekeley: University of California Press.

Starr, G. Ghester. 1977. The Economic and social Growth of Early Greece 800-500 BC. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thomas, Julian. 2004. Archaeology and Modernity. London: Routledge.

Trigger, Bruce. G. 1992. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Velš, Volfgang. 2000. Naša postmoderna moderna. Novi Sad: Izdavačka knižnica Zorana Stojanovića.

Vidal-Nake, Pjer. 2003. Privreda i društvo u staroj Grčkoj: Djelo Mozesa Finlija, U Grčka demokratija u historiji, 43-74. Čačak – Beograd: Gradac.

Watson, Patty Jo, Steven A. LeBlanc and Charles L. Redman. 1971. Explanation in Archaeology. New York: Columbia University Press.

Wilk, Richar R. 1996. Economies and Cultures. Foundations of Economic Anthropology Oxford: Westview Press.

Wylie, Alison. 1982. An analogy by any other name is just as analogical: a commentary on the Gould – Watson dialogue. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 382-401.

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

2010-02-19

Broj časopisa

Sekcija

Druge humanističke i društvene nauke

Najčitanije od istog autora

1 2 > >>