Arheološka stratigrafija, ravna ontologija i tanka deskripcija. Beleška o (inter)disciplinarnom dijalogu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v14i3.4Ključne reči:
novi materijalizma, ontološki obrt, stratigrafija, arheološki zapisApstrakt
Poslednjih decenija pojedini arheolozi preuzimaju iz oblasti filozofije i antropologije pristupe koji se najšire mogu označiti terminom novog materijalizma, koji kritikuje antropocentrični pristup posmatranju predmeta tako što njihovo postojanje tumači pre svega u odnosu na ljude. Predlaže se da se realnost sastoji od niza različitih pojava, koje sve zaslužuju jednaku pažnju posmatrača i njihov status postojanja je jednako relevantan. Istraživač stoga mora uvažiti ravnu ontologiju, prema kojoj nijedan od činilaca nema prednost. S druge strane, arheologija je tradicionalno definisana kao izučavanje materijalnih tragova ljudske prošlosti. U tekstu se problematizuju neke namerne i nenamerne implikacije ovog ontološkog obrta za teoriju i praksu arheologije.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Alberti, Benjamin. 2016. „Archaeologies of Ontology“. Annual Review of Anthropology 45: 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095858
Alberti, Benjamin, Andrew Jones & Joshua Pollard (eds.) 2013. After Interpretation: Returning Materials to Archaeological Theory. Walnut Creek: Left Coast.
Babić, Staša. 2011. „Čemu još istorija arheologije?“. Etnoantropološki problemi 6 (3): 565–577. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v6i3.1
Babić, Staša. 2014a. „Identity, Integration and Power Relations in the Study of the Iron Age“. In Fingerprinting the Iron Age – Integrating South Eastern Europe into the Debate, edited by Cătălin Nicolae Popa and Simon Stoddart, 295–302. Oxford: Oxbow.
Babić, Staša. 2014b. „Zanat arheologa i dijalog sa javnošću“. Etnoantropološki problemi 9 (3): 563–573.
Babić, Staša. 2015. „Theory in Archaeology“. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol 1, edited by James D. Wright, 899–904. Oxford: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8
Babić, Staša. 2018. Metaarheologija. Ogled o uslovima znanja o prošlosti. Beograd: Clio.
Barrett, John. 2016. „The new antiquarianism?“ Antiquity 90: 1681–1686. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2016.216
Berry, David. 2012. „The uses of object-oriented ontology“. Stunlow (blog). 25. 5. 2012. http://stunlaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/uses-of-object-oriented-ontology.html
Bennet, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.
Bogost, Ian. 2012. Alien Phenomenology: or What It’s Like To Be A Thing. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2014. Znanost o znanosti i refleksivnost. Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk
Butler, Eamonn. 2012. Friedrich Hayek: The Ideas and Influence of the Libertarian Economist. Lodnon: Harriman House.
Cipolla, Craig. 2017. „Postscript: Postcolonial Archaeology in the Age of Things“. In Foreign Objects: Rethinking Indigenous Consumption in American Archaeology, edited by Craig Cipolla, 222–229. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Chapman, Robert and Alison Wylie. 2016. Evidential Reasoning in Archaeology. London: Bloomsbury Academic Publishing.
Chapman, Robert and Alison Wylie (eds). 2015. Material Evidence. Learning From Archaeological Practice. London: Routledge
Cobb, Hannah. 2016. „Why the Mesolithic Needs Assemblages“. In Incomplete Archaeologies. Assembling Knowledge in the Past and Present, edited by Emily Miller Bonney, Kathryn J. Franklin and James A. Johnson, 1–8. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Conneller, Chantal. 2011. An Archaeology of Materials. Substantial Transformations in Early Prehistoric Europe. London: Routledge.
Daniel, Glyn. 1976. A Hundred and Fifty Years of Archaeology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Dobres, Marcia-Anne. 2000. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell
Fagan, Melinda. 2010. „Social Construction Revisited: Epistemology and Scientific Practice“. Philosophy of Science 77 (1): 92–116. https://doi.org/10.1086/650210
Fogelin, Lars. 2007. „Inference to the best explanation: A common and effective form of archaeological reasoning“. American Antiquity 72 (4): 603–625. https://doi.org/10.2307/25470436
Galison, Peter. 2010. „Trading with the Enemy“. In Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise, eidted by Michael E. Gorman, 25–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gibbon, Guy. 1989. Explanation in Archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell
Gratton, Peter. 2014. Speculative Realism: Problems and Prospects. London: Bloomsbury.
Harris, Edward C. 1979. Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. London: Academic Press.
Harris, Oliver J. T. and Craig Cipolla. 2017. Archaeological Theory in the New Millennium: Introducing Current Perspectives. London: Routledge
Henare, Amiria, Martin Holbraad and Sari Wastell (eds). 2007. Thinking Through Things. London: Routledge.
Hodder, Ian. 1999. The Archaeological Process. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hodder, Ian. 2012. Entangled. An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Holbraad, Martin. 2012. Truth in Motion: The Recursive Anthropology of Cuban Divination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Holbraad, Martin, Morten Axel Pedersen and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. 2014. „The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions“. Objavljeno 13. 1. 2014.
https://culanth.org/fieldsights/the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions
Holtorf, Cornelius. 2012. „No Farewell to Interpretation“. Current Swedish Archaeology 20: 57–60.
Jones, Andrew. 2002. Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keil, Daniel. 2017. „The Ontological Prison. New Materialisms and their Dead Ends“. Contradictions. A Journal for Critical Thought 1 (2): 41–59.
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Latur, Bruno. 2010. Nikada nismo bili moderni. Esej iz simetrične antropologije (sa francuskog prevela O. Petronić). Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.
Lucas, Gavin. 2001. Critical Approaches to Fieldwork – Contemporary and Historical Archaeological Practice. London: Routledge.
Lucas, Gavin. 2005. The Archaeology of Time. London: Routledge.
Lucas, Gavin. 2012. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olsen, Bjørnar. 1990. „Roland Barthes. From Sign to Text“. In Reading Material Culture, edited by Cristopher Tilley, 163–205. Oxford: Blackwell.
Olsen, Bjørnar. 2002. Od predmeta do teksta. Teorijske perspektive arheoloških istraživanja (prevod s norveškog Ljubiša Rajić). Beograd: Geopoetika.
Olsen, Bjørnar. 2003. „Material culture after text: re-membering things“. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36 (2): 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650310000650
Olsen, Bjørnar. 2010. In Defense of Things. Archaeology and the ontology of objects. Lanham: Altamira Press.
Olsen, Bjørnar. 2012a. „After interpretation: remembering archaeology“. Current Swedish Archaeology 20: 11–34.
Olsen, Bjørnar. 2012b. „Archaeological Theory, Christmass Pork and Red Herrings. Reply to Comments“. Current Swedish Archaeology 20: 95–106.
Olsen, Bjørnar, Michael Shanks, Timothy Webmoor and Cristopher Witmore. 2012. Archaeology – The Discipline of Things. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Palavestra, Aleksandar. 2011. Kulturni konteksti arheologije. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet.
Pearson, Mike and Michael Shanks. 2001. Theatre/Archaeology. London: Routledge.
Renfrew, Colin and Paul Bahn (eds). 2005. Archaeology. The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.
Ribeiro, Arthur. 2018. „Ontologies“. In Encyclopaedia of Global Archaeology, edited by Claire Smith. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_2706-1
Simić, Marina. 2018. „(Not) turning in the Widening Gyre: The (im)possibility of the ontological turn in Eastern Europe“. Anthropological Notebooks 24(2): 61–73.
Subramanian, Meera. 2019. „Anthropocene now: influential panel votes to recognize Earth’s new epoch“. Nature. Objavljeno 21. 5. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01641-5
Thomas, Julian. 2004. Archaeology and Modernity. London: Routledge.
Thomas, Julian. 2012. „A British Perspective on Bjørnar Olsen’s ‘After Interpretation’“. Current Swedish Archaeology 20: 83–88.
Thomas, Julian. 2015. „The future of archaeological theory“. Antiquity 89: 1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2015.183
Van Oyen, Astrid. 2016. „Historicising Material Agency: from Relations to Relational Constellations“. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23: 354–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9244-0
Witmore, Cristopher. 2007. „Symmetrical archaeology: Excerpts of a manifesto“. World Archaeology 39 (4): 546–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240701679411
Witmore, Cristopher. 2014. Archaeology and the New Materialism. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1: 203–246. http://dx.doi.10.1558/jca.v1i2.16661
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2019 Staša Babić
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
