Représentation pessimiste de la nature de l’existence humaine dans le film „Monde occidental“: interprétation misanthropologique ultérieure
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v12i2.4Mots-clés :
anthropologie, film, science fiction, réalité sociale et culturelle, hommes et androïdesRésumé
Ici est analysée la communication culturelle dans le contexte de la science fiction, considérée comme partie intégrante de la culture populaire. Deux principaux thèmes traités par ce film sont la nature de la réalité et la nature de l’androïde. Le message perçu grâce au repérage d’une suite d’oppositions binaires, tient dans l’affirmation de qu’il est impossible de dépasser l’instabilité des rapports entre l’ordre normatif et le comportement humain – ce pourquoi il est interprété comme une vision pessimiste de l’existence.
Téléchargements
Références
Antonijević, Dragana. 2012. Sanjaju li klonovi ljubav? Predstave o klonovima u popularnoj kulturi, Etnoantropološki problemi 7 (2): 359-380.
Bratić, Dobrila. 1985. Ponovno sahranjivanje ubijenog vanbračnog djeteta – ritualna kontrola kulture nad prirodom. Etnološke sveske VI: 41-46.
Carrithers, Michael. 1992. Why Humans Have Cultures. Explaining Anthropology and Social Diversity. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.
Daglas, Meri. 2001. Kako institucije misle. Beograd: Fabrika knjiga.
Dockterman, Eliana. 2016. Sci-fi evolves into disturbing reality in Black Mirror and Westworld. Time 188 (16/17): 90.
Gavrilović, Ljilјana. 2011. Svi naši svetovi. O antropologiji, naučnoj fantastici i fantaziji. Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU.
Grejber, Dejvid. 2016. Utopija pravila. O tehnologiji, gluposti i skrivenim radostima birokratije. Beograd: Geopoetika.
Heer, Jeet. 2016. Killer Reboot: The robots of Westworld wake up to the trauma of humanity. New Republic 247 (12): 67-68.
Heintz, Monica. 2013. “Introduction: Why There Should Be Anthropology of Moralities”. In The Anthropology of Moralities, ed. Monica Heintz, 1-19. New York/ Oxford: Berghahn.
Keterer, Dejvid. 1991. Solaris i vanbračna sunca naučne fantastike. Gradina 7-8-9: 125-138.
Kovačević, Ivan. 2001. Semiologija mita i rituala I. tradicija. Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar.
Kovačević, Ivan, Vladimira Ilić. 2016. Antropologija filma u Srbiji. Etnoantropološki problemi 11 (1): 217-239.
Levi-Stros, Klod. 1999. Tužni tropi. Beograd: Zepter Book World.
Lyotard, Jean François. 1991. The Inhuman: Reflections on Time. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nussbaum, Emily. 2016. Second World: The fantasies of “Westworld”. New Yorker 92 (34): 82-83.
Orr, Christopher. 2016. Sympathy for the Robot. Atlantic 318 (3): 38-40.
Powdermaker, Hortense. 1951. Hollywood: The Dream Factory. An Anthropologist Looks at the Movie Makers. London: Secker & Warburg.
Ristivojević, Marija. 2009. Bahtin o karnevalu. Etnoantropološki problemi 4 (3): 197-210.
Robbins, Joel. “2013. Morality, Value and radical Cultural Change”. In The Anthropology of Moralities, ed. Monica Heintz, 62-80. Oxford: Berghahn.
Sim, Stuart. 2001. Lyotard i neljudsko. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.
Swirski, Peter. 2000. Poe, Lem and Explorations in Aesthetics, Cognitive Science, and Literary Knowledge. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press 2000.
Urošević, Vlada. 1991. Fantastika i naučna fantastika: srodnosti nasuprot svim razlikama. Gradina 7-8-9: 146-170.
Welesko, Brian. 2014. Brigman Award Winner. Interstitial Reality: Service Tunnels, Steam Pipes, and Glitches in Constructed Worlds. The Journal of Popular Culture 47 (1): 3-20.
Yakai, Kathy 1985. Michael Crichton: Reflections of a New Designer. Computel Magazine 57: 44–45.
Žikić, Bojan. 2010. „Mi smo Ja, a oni su Roj. Individualni i kolektivni identitet kao relaciono svojstvo ljudi i tuđina u naučnoj fantastici“. U Naš svet, drugi svetovi. Antropologija, naučna fantastika i kulturni identiteti, ur. Bojan Žikić, 191-218. Beograd: Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta i Srpski genealoški centar.
Žikić, Bojan. 2012. Popularna kultura: nadkulturna komunikacija. Etnoantropološki problemi 7 (2): 315-341.
Žikić, Bojan. 2015. What Makes People Good or Bad? (Mis)Anthropological Essay on Searching for Social/ Cultural Reasons on Judging the Other People. Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 10 (4): 927–943.
Žikić, Bojan. 2016. Why Do We Need Misanthropology in Anthropology? An Exploratory Essay in Deliberating the Research Subfield. Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 11 (4): 967–988.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
