Arheologija i etnicitet

Autori

  • Staša Babić Odeljenje za arheologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v5i1.7

Ključne reči:

arheologija, etnicitet, kulturnoistorijski pristup, identitet, savremeni kontekst istraživanja

Apstrakt

Članak razmatra istoriju arheološkog istraživanja kolektivnog identiteta u prošlosti. Kulturnoistorijski pristup oslanja se punom težinom na koncept kulturne grupe, presudno obeležen modernim shvatanjima nacionalne države – jedinstva teritorije, materijalne kulture, jezika i etničke pripadnosti. Primena ovog koncepta dovela je do drastičnih političkih zloupotreba, od kojih je najpoznatiji primer Gustava Kosine u nacističkoj Nemačkoj. Uviđanje da sama suština tako shvaćenog kolektivnog identiteta zajednica u prošlosti neminovno vodi u projekciju modernog modela nacionalne države, dovelo je do korenitog preispitivanja. Tako arheolozi poslednjih decenija istražuju druge puteve posmatranja kolektivnog i individualnog identiteta u prošlosti, zasnovane na konstruktivističkom pristupu.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Reference

Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

Arnold, B. 1990. The past as propaganda: totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany. Antiquity 64: 464 – 478.

------------- 1992. The Past as Propaganda – How Hitler’s archaeologists distorted European prehistory to justify racist and territorial goals, Archaeology July-August 1992: 30 – 37.

Babić, S. 2002. Still innocent after all these years? Sketches for a social history of archaeology in Serbia. Archaologien Europas: Geschihte, Methoden und Theorien/Archaeologies of Europe: History, Methods and Theories, Tubinger Archaologische Taschenbucher. Band 3: 309 – 322.

----------- 2008. Grci i drugi – antička percepcija i percepcija antike. Beograd: Klio.

---------- 2009. Jezik arheologije II (ili: Kako sam preživela promenu paradigme). Etnoantropološki problemi 4 (1): 123 – 132.

Binford, L. R. 1962. Archaeology as Anthropology, American Antiquity 28: 217 – 225.

Cartledge, P. 2002 . The Greeks – A Portrait of Self and Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Canuto, M. A. & J. Yaeger (eds). 2000. The Archaeology of Communities. A New World Perspective. London, New York: Routledge.

Casella, E. C. & C. Fowler (eds). 2004. The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities – Beyond Identification. New York: Springer.

Childe, V. G. 1929. The Danube in Prehistory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Derks, T. & N. Roymans (eds). 2009. Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity – The role of power and tradition. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Díaz Andreu, M., S. J. Lucy, S. Babić & D. N. Edwards. 2005. The Archaeology of Identity, Approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religio. London, New York: Routledge.

Diaz-Andreu, M. & T. Champion (eds). 1996. Nationalism and archaeology in Europe. London: University College London Press.

Diaz-Andreu M. & T. Champion. 1996. Nationalism and archaeology in Europe: an introduction. In: Nationalism and archaeology in Europe, M. Diaz-Andreu, T. Champion (eds), 1 – 23. London: University College London Press.

Dietler, M. 2005. The Archaeology of Colonization and the Colonization of Archaeology – Theoretical Challenges from an Ancient Mediterranean Colonian Encounter. In: The Archaeology of Colonial Encounters – Comparative Perspectives, Gil J. Stein (ed.), 33 – 68. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

Dougherty C. & L. Kurke (eds). 2003. The Cultures within Ancient Greek Culture – Contact, Conflict, Collaboration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dostal, W. & A. Gingrich. 1996. German and Austrian anthropology. In: Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology, A. Barnard & J. Spencer (eds), 263 – 265. London, New York: Routledge.

Džonson, М. 2008. Arheološka teorija. Beograd: Klio.

Gellner, E. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

Gibbon, G. 1989. Explanation in Archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.

Graves-Brown, P., S. Jones, C. Gamble (eds). 1996. Cultural Identity and Archaeology – The Construction of European Communities. London, New York: Routledge.

Goff, B. (ed). 2005. Classics and Colonialism. London: Duckworth.

Gosden, C. 1999. Anthropology and Archaeology. London, New York: Routledge.

-------------- 2004. Archaeology and Colonialism. Cultural Contacts from 5000 BC to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hall, E. 1989. Inventing the Barbarian – Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hall, J. M. 1997. Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Härke, H. 1995. 'The Hun is a methodical chap' – Reflections on the German tradition of pre- and proto-history. In: Theory in Archaeology – A World Perspective, P. J. Ucko (ed.), 46 – 60. London, New York: Routledge.

Harrison, T. (ed). 2002. Greeks and Barbarians. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Hartog, F. 1980. Le miroir d'Herodote. Essai sur la representation de l'autre. Paris: Gallimard.

Hingley, R. 2005. Globalizing Roman Culture – Unity, diversity and empire. London, New York: Routledge.

Hobsbom, E. i T. Rejndžer (ur). 2002. Izmišljanje tradicije. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.

Insoll, T. (ed). 2007. The Archaeology of Identities. London, New York: Routledge.

Isbell, W. H. 2000. What we should be studying. The “imagined community” and the “natural community”. In: The Archaeology of Communities. A New World Perspective, Canuto, M. A. & J. Yaeger (eds), 243 – 266. London, New York: Routledge.

Jones, S. 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity – Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London, New York: Routledge.

Kuklick, H. 1996. Diffusionism. In: Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology, A. Barnard & J. Spencer (eds), 160 – 162. London, New York: Routledge.

ohl, P. & C. Fawcett (eds). 1995. Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lucy, S. 2005. Ethnic and cultural identities. In: The Archaeology of Identity, Approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion,Díaz Andreu, M., S. J. Lucy, S. Babić & D. N. Edwards (eds), 86 – 109. London, New York: Routledge.

Meskell, L. (ed). 1998. Archaeology Under Fire – Nationalism, politics and heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London, New York: Routledge.

Olsen, B. 2002. Od predmeta do teksta. Teorijske perspektive arheoloških istraživanja. Beograd: Geopoetika.

Renfrew, C. 1987. Archaeology & Language. The Puzzle of the Indo-European Origins. London: Jonathan Cap

Shanks, M. & C. Tilley. 1987. Re-constructing Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thomas, J. 2000. Introduction: the polarities of post-processual archaeology. In: Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader, J.Thomas (ed), 1 – 18. London, New York: Leicester University Press.

-------------- 2004. Archaeology and Modernity. London, New York: Routledge.

Trigger, B. 1989. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vinkelman, J. J. 1996. Istorija drevne umetnosti. Sremski Karlovci, Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

2010-02-19

Broj časopisa

Sekcija

Druge humanističke i društvene nauke

Najčitanije od istog autora

1 2 > >>